User:Cdw1952/WP abuse
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cdw1952/WP_abuse. |
Comments about and by User:Loremaster (LM)[edit]
See: Special:Contributions/Loremaster
- User:Moreschi is a sysop who has the ability to block Loremaster for his many violations of WP.
- User_talk:Batvette#Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory) But I guess you needed to react to the Personal Attacks on you by User:Loremaster: to deny his accusations about you (I will not repeat them). And I don't believe them. From my experience it's quite the opposite - you must be of sound mind - just because you're the victim such personal attacks - the credibility of someone who does that to another editor - is very low in my estimation. Comments by user --Ludvikus (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory)#Possible Links, Quotes, etc. Batvette, in light of your history on this talk page, I won't waste my time responding to your rant except to say this: Since no one cares about your biased opinion nor needs you to referee discussions on this talk page, limit yourself to discussing possible improvements to the New World Order (conspiracy theory) article or get lost. --Loremaster (talk) 22:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:New World Order (conspiracy theory)#A possible clarification of why the NPOV issue keeps raising its ugly head. One can see in the archives you have a long history here of marginalizing new editors as cranks when most have presented rational positions based upon real life concerns, it is not they who are biased but you... Batvette (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Right-wing populist conspiracy theorists (like you) are absolutely clueless about what global governance, capitalism, socialism, communism, Nazism, and totalitarianism actually are... --Loremaster (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Talk:National-Anarchism/Archive_2#NA and the Red-green-brown alliance See WP:ORIGINAL and WP:SYNTHESIS.Spylab (talk) 23:26, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Nothing I said contradicts these Wikipedia guidelines. You seem to be advocating that we simply copy and paste what references say because in your misinterpreation of these guidelines there is no room for summarizing or paraphrasing. --LM (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- What I'm saying is there is no room for making things up and pretending that the references support those claims.Spylab (talk) 23:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- User_talk:Xeno/Archive_21#National-Anarchism is a recent (March 2010) incident of edit warring by Loremaster. It contains suggestions on seeking a 3rd opinion or WP:MEDCAB assistance. --I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 23:07, 13 May 2010 (UTC)