User talk:Feedback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User:Feedback)
Jump to: navigation, search


MY USER AND TALK PAGE


Welcome to my Talk Page!

If you wish to send me a message please deliver it after reading the following guidelines:
  • Make sure I'm the person you want to talk to. If you want to discuss a post of mine elsewhere on Wikipedia, make sure its me. Feedback is my signature.
  • If I write on your talk page, be polite and answer there. Don't worry, your page is on my watchlist, I'll see your posts.
  • If you write me here, I will answer you here. Please watch my talk page because I won't post a {{talkback}} on your page.
  • I will not answer messages which weren't signed (~~~~) so please, sign your posts.
  • Please do not give personal insults. Not only do I not have time for that, but I want our relationship to be as amicable as possible.
Go ahead now, post!
Wikipedia:Babel
Flag of Puerto Rico.svg This user is a Puerto Rican.
en This user is a native speaker of English.
es Este usuario tiene el español como lengua materna.
Search user languages

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico

Qxz-ad59.gif

Infobox

17:53 UTC
Wednesday, 23 July
Feedback
User
This is me
Name: Feedback
Gender: male
Birth date: July 7
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Interests: Biology, Medicine, Television, Movies & Film, Pool, C&VGs, Professional Wrestling, Travel, Track
Interests: Biology, Medicine, Television, Movies & Film, Pool, C&VGs, Professional Wrestling, Travel, Track
Interests: Biology, Medicine, Television, Movies & Film, Pool, C&VGs, Professional Wrestling, Travel, Track

My World

United States flag Puerto Rico flag New York flag Italy flag

Comments


re[edit]

Yeah. I think that user must have a minor number of contributions, isn't it?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I don't think there's a policy perse, but it's worrying that his FIRST edit was an AFD. Obviously, this is an experienced user operating under the guise of an IP. No way will someone stumble onto Wikipedia and his first edit ends up being an AFD. Feedback 15:01, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Miss x factor has created Davina Rose's article. Can we make a speedy delete or another afd?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
also, i recently see in your onfobox that you can speak spanish. Will i annoying you if I talk to you in spanish when i cant find the words?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Of course not. Fíjate, no sabía que hablabas español. Ahora vi que eres miembro de es.wikipedia. Tengo un usuario ahí, pero realmente no estoy activo. Editas mucho allá? Feedback 20:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Hola. Jeje, al fin puedo expresarme correctamente. Y eso que siempre me he disculpado por no hablar ingles a niel nativo y los fallos que cometia. Bueno, pues si, aunque hay pocos miembros en el proyecto, asi que suelo ser yo el que revierta vandalismos y actualizo articulos, pero mas de tna e indys, wwe no la veo. Me alegra poder entenderme con otro miembro de aqui, hay algunas conversaciones que aun no cojo. Si no me he metido mucho con los campeonatos mundiales o los borrados es porque ya discuten demasiado y no lo cojo todo.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

puesmpor una tonteria tan simple como que escribi mal al ingresar xd. No more, no less. Por cierto, si quieres seguir hablando, deberiamos hacerlo por otros medios. Facebook, quizas? PD ¿Qué crees que deberíamos hacer con Tons of Funk?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Lo nominé a AFD. La gente tienen que parar de hacer todo tipo de artículo que se le ocurre. Envíame un email y te contestaré con mi info de FB. Feedback 20:34, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
OK. ENviado. Por cierto, deberías mirar esas consultas, no veo que salga la tabla. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Your "You have a new messages" banner... very good. Fooled me. Cabe6403 (TalkSign) 09:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
LOL at least I got someone! Feedback 00:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your deleted files[edit]

Here's the entirety of all of your deleted edits to the file namespace since your account was created, although most of them are edits to pages that other people uploaded. Of course you can edit the list; the "Don't modify this content" header was simply the first one that I thought of using. Nyttend (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! This really helps. Feedback 17:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Jericho title.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Jericho title.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. —Theopolisme (talk) 21:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

ayudita[edit]

Hola, Feedback. Te importaría echarme una manita con algo? Es que verás, he tenido un incidente con The Funkadactyls y como eres el unico que conozco que habla español, creo que puedo expresarme mejor. Vi que habían hecho un artículo y, como estamos en una especie de limpieza de artículos no relevantes, decidí que lo mejor sería redirigir a Bordus Clay. Sin emabrgo, otro usuario se empeñó en que era relevante porque tendrán una lucha en WM y deshace mis ediciones. Le expliqué varias veces en que consistía el proyecto, las reglas y porque no es relevante y es mejor la redirección. Total, guerra de ediciones y cuando le intenté hacer algo por vandalo, me cayó el chaparrón a mí. me trataron como a un vándalo y dejaron The Funkadactyls como artículo y lo bloquearon. Un usuario "muy listo" dice que sí es notable y, hasta que no se solucione, protegerá el artículo y lo dejará como artículo hasta que se lelgue a un acuerdo. He explicado mil veces como funciona el proyecto, en qué nos basamos para decir que algo es relevante y merece un artículo, puse ejemplos, puse link a las afd para que vieran como trabajamos, pero nada. Expliqué mil veces las reglas, pero dicen que no he explicado nada, así que ya ha lleado el punto en que me han dicho que mejor, otros usuarios hablen por mí, porque no me estoy ayudando nada. Podrías ayudarme, por favor? El editor listo dice que deberíamos llevarlo a afd, pero es algo tan simple como dejar una redirección, pero nada funciona. Un saludo y gracias por tu tiempo. PD, aun no me llegó nada al Face. Te llegó mi mensaje? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Algo me obligó tener que desactivar Facebook y no lo he reactivado todavía. Cuando lo reactive, te agrego. Yo verifico ahora tus contribuciones para ayudarte con The Funkadactyls. Feedback 23:44, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined - Template:Current-PWCOTW[edit]

I have declined your speedy deletion nomination on this, because it is transcluded on a number of talk pages - see list. Deleting it would leave a redlink on all those pages (and tagging it for speedy actually dumped all of them into the speedy-deletion queue!) The only valid speedy reasons for templates are the two at WP:CSD#Templates, and this seems to me to be doing no harm - as used on those pages it is recording that they were PWCOTW in the past. If you think it should be deleted, take it to WP:TFD with a plan for what to do about the transclusions. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Marvel vs. DC.png[edit]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Fixed it. Feedback 16:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Feedback. You have new messages at User:David Levy.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
(leaving this because I posted a follow-up to an old message) —David Levy 00:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:WWE Championship (2010).jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:WWE Championship (2010).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:04, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey![edit]

I was reading this HERE and I am glad you kept your cool and continue to edit here. You are the sort of editor that make Wikipedia a pleasant community despite the few not-so-pleasant occasional distractions. Take care, Mercy11 (talk) 00:01, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

You're giving me too much credit. I wouldn't say I make WP a pleasant community, I'm quite blunt and sarcastic in stressful conversations. I just decided to drop the issue. I still think the project should have a design, but the issue was obviously more important to him than it was to me. Feedback 07:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
FYI, he actually cited that conversation when he reverted me after partially restoring that format. From that discussion it is easy to tell that there was no real consensus, shall we open it again? - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:39, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
We could open it again, but really, what is there to discuss? The only thing missing is Ahnoneemoose's "seal of approval" for us to put it back. I seriously don't feel like negotiating with the almighty King of the WikiProject. He has made it clear he would not budge on the issue, therefore, it might require outside intervention, and I really think it would be a waste of anyone's time to ask them to mediate a conversation about a WikiProject design. Best case scenario, 2 or 3 other WP:PUR editors actually participate this time, we get a clear consensus and Ahoneemoose backs down. But do you see him recognizing any sort of consensus that disagrees with his own opinion? Call me pessimistic, but I don't think so. Feedback 04:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
It is not likely, but at least that way we can at least avoid a diatribe when we restore it. I know that you are being sarcastic, but he has actually presented himself as some sort of WP:PUR "mediator" and seems to frequently speak on behalf of the entire project. So... - Caribbean~H.Q. 04:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
He's a funny fella. I guess we should reopen the conversation. Hopefully Mercy and Tony also chime in. And hey, if one of them agrees with Ahnoneemoose, it's even better, because like that we actually get to debate with someone who doesn't believe we are his loyal subjects in his mighty kingdom. Feedback 04:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
In that long thread, there are a few links (to Photobucket images) that I posted refuting his argument that the templates "breaks the page when seen from a smartphone" and had to be removed immediately (even in the middle of a discussion that covered such behavior). With that, we can easily form some chatter and adhere a straw poll as well. We need to re-establish consensus as the go-to method to ensure a quality standard, seeing the entire WP being controlled by unilateral actions is incredible. - Caribbean~H.Q. 05:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Fotos[edit]

Hola, Feedback. Una cosilla, me he fijado que en los articulos de Ziggler y Big Daddy V había unas fotos que han desaparecido. Una es la de Ziggler como campeon en parejas en Spirit Squad, la otra es Viscera entrando a un evento y ya no salen. Ha pasado algo con ellas? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree files[edit]

See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 24#OTRS pending since April. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

RE:[edit]

He didn't, that is why I changed my posture. I did not notify anyone because the original idea was to simply seek outside intervention to deal with the issues affecting these pages, not to do anything that could be interpreted as "punishment". I even vouched for him to keep anyone that was interested in blocking him at bay, but.. Well, you read that thread. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Yearly WWE seasons[edit]

So Feedback, I linked you when I brung up the topic again, but not sure if you saw it with the quick archive period that was on the page. Seeing as you were the most enthusiastic about this idea, would you be willing to start up an article? I would gladly help you in any way needed. STATic message me! 02:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

The fact that it was archived without me being able to chime in and without the conversation reaching a solid consensus is what made me extend the archive to 21 days. Of course I was the most enthusiastic, but that's because I came up with it lol. I'm in my first year of Med School though. When I wrote the idea, I had completely underestimated how busy I would be. I wish I could, but I don't see myself starting an article any time soon. Maybe I'll have some free time in the Spring (or so I hope). Feedback 02:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I had a feeling that is what had happened. And I know, I had actually thought of the same idea recently when you posted it, that's why I attempted to bring it back up. That is really cool though, good luck with all that, I am sure you will be reaping the rewards in a few years and all the hard work will be worth it. Just if you ever do get the time to (since I do not see anyone else besides us two really interested into putting the ground work into this), do not be afraid to drop a message my way, I would be more than happy to help out. STATic message me! 07:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

True Detective AfD[edit]

Sorry dude, this AfD is uncalled for and looks like a deliberate end-run around the failed move request consensus that was determined earlier this month. If you persist, such "moving the battlefield" from one process to another could get you a brief block, I've already notified the admin who move protected the pages and cleaned up the mess from the failed move request b.s.--ColonelHenry (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your accusation is baseless and uncalled for. As you can see from my contributions, I've never even set foot at True Detective (TV series) before today. I did not see the move discussion, but be that as it may, it is hardly relevant to the discussion I'm bringing forward. My argument is about getting rid of the unnecessary disambiguation page. If the consensus is to turn True Detective into a redirect, then so be it. I care very little about renaming the article as long as people are able to access it without the silly dab. Feedback 00:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Extant Organizations/Noticeboard[edit]

Someone suggested at the Village Pump that I boldly create Wikipedia:Extant Organizations/Noticeboard, a noticeboard to discuss articles about organizations that may be subject to non-neutral editing. Basically it's the corporate version of BLPN, where both adverts and attack pages can be brought to the community for broader scrutiny. Except this board does not currently relate to a specific policy like BLPN does, except NPOV, V, etc. (though it could refer to this essay I wrote or something). You participated in the prior village pump discussion that led to consensus for Template:COI editnotice, which is now widely used. Although this noticeboard is not COI-related, I thought you might have an interest in this as well, in whether the noticeboard should be kept and/or in participating in it generally. CorporateM (Talk) 18:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (2011) peer review[edit]

Hi Feedback, due to your experience in editing professional wrestling related articles (and other experience for GAs), I'd like to invite you to comment on the peer review for Money in the Bank (2011), which I have an interest to eventually push for Featured Article status. Thank you very much. starship.paint ~ regal 15:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)