User:JIAZHI SHUAI/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article[edit]
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Chartered Financial Analyst
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. Because I am CFA Level 2 candidate, so I am interested in it.
Lead[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? YES
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? YES
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? YES
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? YES
Lead evaluation[edit]
Content[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? YES
- Is the content up-to-date? NO
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
Content evaluation[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? YES
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? NO
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? NO
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? NO
Tone and balance evaluation[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? YES
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? YES
- Are the sources current? YES
- Check a few links. Do they work? YES
Sources and references evaluation[edit]
Organization[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? YES
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? YES, I have fixed it.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? YES
Organization evaluation[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? YES
- Are images well-captioned? YES
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? YES
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? YES
Images and media evaluation[edit]
Checking the talk page[edit]
- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? 8./10
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It focused more on facts.
Talk page evaluation[edit]
Overall impressions[edit]
- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? Great
- What are the article's strengths? I think it gave the accurate information
- How can the article be improved? No
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation[edit]
Optional activity[edit]
- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: