User talk:122.62.226.243

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, 122.62.226.243, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Talk page messages[edit]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Fabrication of sources[edit]

BlackCab has alleged both on this page and at AN/I that you have fabricated sources. Please do not fail to continue to participate in the ongoing Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents debate mentioned above, as this is a very serious accusation. If this is a lie, it is also a grave matter that BlackCab must face. Carrite (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I do dimly recall him saying this -this would have been about 3-4? years ago from memory. I cant recall any of the exact detail.I think the issue was that he could not find the section or information used by me-I may have put the wrong page number on in error. He may have looked in another edition? I tend to do research over several weeks from mant difrent sources and make jottings on paper as I go- so may have misread my handwriting. A simple human error. When he queried this I no longer had the book. That's how I recall the issue anyway. Since that time I have been much more careful to write pages numbers correctly. I suppose it would be good to put down the exact edition,especially if there has been a major rewrite. Thanks for your interest and concern.Claudia

For the record, I have listed three cases of fabricated citations at the ANI.[1] The incidents range from two years ago to 13 months ago. If you want to respond, it is best you do so at the Administrators Noticeboard/Incidents link provided above, rather than here. BlackCab (TALK) 23:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I replied to the editor involved directly.Claudia

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Per a discussion at WP:ANI. The block might be lifted if you will agree to create an account and promise to follow Wikipedia policy in the future. The concerns about your editing are documented in the ANI report. The most serious is that you may have been adding wrong information to Wikipedia due to mistakes or omissions in the referencing process and the use of bad sources. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.My refs are better than lots of others in wiki. Information in my edits is not wrong. Refs are all fine cf those used by some of the editors (including some involved in this ban!) who continue to knowingly use discredited authors. Using my refs I can find the source within 2-5 seconds- some editors are being pedantic and autocratic.