User talk:68.60.68.203/Libya AIDS case

the draft is here User talk:68.60.68.203/Libya AIDS case/Draft

comments

LOG

new page for talk on this subject 68.60.68.203 20:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new work page for draft68.60.68.203 20:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HIV trial in Libya

Hi there, I noticed you are editing HIV trial in Libya and using a bunch of html coding. That is unnecessary on Wikipedia and actually is a bit messy. Whilst we appreciate the effort, when you get a minute you might want to go through the tutorials above to see how we like to do things here! Also if you like editing, why not sign up and log in? Zarboki 09:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in HIV trial in Libya you've got to cite your sources! A simple <ref>[http://www.someplace.com description]</ref> will work. Simesa 16:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've recently entered a great deal of new text entered into the sections Case 44/1999 of People's Court of Libya and Case 213/2002 - Case 607/2003 Benghazi Appeals Court. [1] and [2] are given as the sources -- however, my concern is that at least some of this text appears to have been taken verbatim from those webpages. We have to be very careful that we have permission to use quoted text -- an alternative is to rewrite the material in such a way as to be non-violating. (There is an official Wikipedia policy, Wikipedia:Copyright violations, discussing what to do if there actually is a major problem.) Please check what you've added -- we do greatly appreciate your interest in the article and Wikipedia. Simesa 03:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a timeline which is a Bulgarian embassy release. I think the want it diseminated. Your point is taken

I had no intention of leaving it as is but it is public domain and does not violate any copywrite. Having a factual framework to work from is going to make this a lot easier - like reverse engineering68.60.68.203 03:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article 4 The following shall not be subject to copyright

1 normative and individual acts of state govening bodies, and the official translations therof.

http://www.wipo.int/clea/docs_new/pdf/en/bg/bg001en.pdf Bulgarian Law on Copyright and Neighboring rights68.60.68.203 04:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LAW ON COPYRIGHT AND NEIGHBORING RIGHTS Bulgaria

(PUBLISHED IN STATE GAZETTE NO. 56/29.06.1993) Part One

COPYRIGHT

Chapter One

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subject Matter Article 1. This Law shall regulate the relations connected with creation and distribution of literary, artistic and scientific works.

Arising of Copyright Article 2. Copyright on literary, artistic and scientific works shall arise for the author upon the creation of the work.

Chapter Two

SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT

Protected Works

Article 3. (1) Subject to copyright is any literary, artistic and scientific work which is a result of creative activities and is expressed in whatever manner and whatever tangible form, such as:

1. literary works, including works of scientific and technical literature, publicism, and computer programs;

2. musical works;

3. stage works - dramatic works, dramatico-musical works, pantomimes, choreographic works etc.;

4. films and other audiovisual works;

5. works of fine arts, including works of applied art, design, and folklore artistic crafts;

6. works of architecture;

7. photographic works, and works created by a process analogous to the photographic;

8. projects, maps, schemes, plans and others related to architecture, territorial lay-out, geography, topography, museum activities, and any other field of science and technics;

9. graphic arrangement of a printed edition.

(2) Subject to copyright shall also be:

1. translations and adaptations of pre-existing works and folklore works;

2. arrangements of musical works and folklore works;

3. periodicals, encyclopaedias, collections, anthologies, bibliographies, data bases, and other works similar to the above, which include two or more works or materials.

(3) Subject to copyright shall also be a part of a work under paragraphs 1 and 2, as well as preparatory drawings, plans and other works of the kind.

Exceptions

Article 4. The following shall not be subject to copyright:

1. normative and individual acts of state governing bodies, and the official translations thereof

2. ideas and concepts;

3. folklore works;

4. news, facts, information and data.

third strike 68.60.68.203 06:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(was) Start Here

DRAFT NOW HAS OWN WORK PAGE User talk:68.60.68.203/Libya AIDS case/Draft

Note on your text

Hello anonymous user 68.60.68.203!

I notice you have copied text from an article into this page, presumably to find references for the text. Please take care not to add this page (your user talk page) into categories meant only for articles.

Also, since this page is mainly for people to leave Wikipedia-related messages for you, I would strongly advise you to store the text as a subpage of this page, for example in User talk:68.60.68.203/Libya AIDS case. This will enable others to leave a message without accidentally disturbing or erasing your text, and also you can see others' messages different from your own text. Regards, Kimchi.sg 10:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 68.60.68.203!

I've watched you gradually buildm this article and applaud your efforts. The only comment I have now is that your Intro is over twice too long for an Intro. Please try to move interesting but non-essential facts under some header. Again, an impressive display of work so far! Simesa 11:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

moving to User talk:68.60.68.203/Libya AIDS case/Draft 68.60.68.203 19:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

+ cleanup-date|February 2007 HIV trial in Libya

any explanation of what you want done? there is a discussion page68.60.68.203 15:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The template talks about itself. The article needs a cleanup to meet Wikipedia standards. The template states the following:

This article or section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please help improve this article or replace this tag with a more specific message. This article has been tagged since February 2007. (help, talk)

So what's would be the reason to state the same thing at the talk page if the template is quite explicit? -- Szvest - ^{Wiki me up ®} 16:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]