User talk:82.174.179.202

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 81.187.192.168. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! 81.187.192.168 (talk) 13:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ed Rush#Edit war --82.174.179.202 (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get that your template says you adding it here "does not imply that there are any issues with your editing", but given you posted it here (and without any additional context) and not on the Talk page of IP editor 81.187.192.168, I'm still interpreting your contribution as implying that my contested edit was incorrect. It was not. I suggest you carefully (re)read what I wrote at Talk:Ed Rush#Edit war. --82.174.179.202 (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]