User talk:Aecis/Messages 241-252

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User talk:Aecis
Archived messages
Messages 1-12 • Messages 13-24 • Messages 25-36 • Messages 37-48 • Messages 49-60 • Messages 61-72 • Messages 73-84 • Messages 85-96 • Messages 97-108 • Messages 109-120 • Messages 121-132 • Messages 133-144 • Messages 145-156 • Messages 157-168 • Messages 169-180 • Messages 181-192 • Messages 193-204 • Messages 205-216 • Messages 217-228 • Messages 229-240 • Messages 241-252 • Messages 253-264 • Messages 265-276 • Messages 277-288 • Messages 289-300 • Messages 301-312 • Messages 313-324 • Messages 325-336 • Messages 337-348 • Messages 349-360 • Messages 361-372 • Messages 373-384 • Messages 385-396 • Messages 397-408 • Messages 409-420 • Messages 421-432 • Messages 433-444 • Messages 445-456 • Messages 457-468 • Messages 469-480 • Messages 481-492 • Messages 493-504 • Messages 505-516
Archived Wikipedia Signposts
Signposts 1-12 • Signposts 13-24 • Signposts 25-36 • Signposts 37-48 • Signposts 49-60 • Signposts 61-72 • Signposts 73-84 • Signposts 85-96 • Signposts 97-108
Archived newsletters
Alternative music: 1-12 • 13-24
Formula One: 1-12 •
Military history: 1-12 • 13-24

Indeed you are correct[edit]

Hi there. With regard to taking a Wiki-Break, I'm pretty much on one as it is. I very rarely edit the TRNC article, or indeed any Cypriot article as, quite frankly, the way that many editors there spin and distort the truth to suit their agendas is repugnant and disgusting. However the TRNC article had reached a point where it was neutral but sadly certain individuals couldn't let it be and continued to push their anti Turkish Cypriot POV. I chose to edit one sentence and let those people concerned know what I think of them. There is a cabal of editors who choose to push every issue and challenge every minor point with unceasing vigor, the result of this is a consistent movement for the articles in question to move towards and extreme pro-greek POV. This is one of the main faults with Wikipedia is that by its very nature it isnt a repository of the truth, it is a repository of the majorities perception of the truth. Most of the time it doesn't bother me as I have a very busy life to deal with, but some times, as you see, it does annoy me. Plus I have some time off right now and I have the time to pursue these distractions. I wouldnt worry about my blood pressure if I were you, instead worry about the blood pressure of people that maintain that their countrymen murdering women and children was justified or actually never happened at all. The TRNC article is worth keeping an eye on, I dread to think what the Greek language version says. Adam777 15:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Would you consider changing your vote based on the proposal that I made? See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Western Frontier for details. --Richard 14:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your question[edit]

Category:Sports playing surfaces ?? FT2 (Talk | email) 00:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Sports playing areas" ? FT2 (Talk | email) 01:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend, I think we had some discussions in the past about the economy section of the Georgia article and I just updated it. Please let me know what do you think about it. Cheers!SosoMK 18:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Man Again[edit]

You asked about why I added a link to Caroline Thompson on a web page about Caroline Thompson... when it was a different person. Well, that's exactly why I did it: to help people who come to the page hoping to learn about "the" Caroline Thompson, only to discover that the page is about a competely different (and to them completely unknown) Caroline Thompson ("your" Caroline Thompson).

How else to do this? Gill110951

2007 UK letterbombs article[edit]

Has now been moved. Thanks for the info on naming conventions. J.P.Lon 13:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Reminder: Anna Nicole Smith[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Anna Nicole Smith, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! (jarbarf) 20:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for fixing the vandalism to my user page!

Atlant 18:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I have not added my own opinion into articles. see my sourcehereAristovoul0s 13:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, just out of curiosity, may i ask why editors are being treated differently? See these series of edits [1] that are protected by an admin Aristovoul0s

Well? I have never added my own opinion. Could you please substantiate? Aristovoul0s 14:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I have repeatedly added a fact tag here [2] [3] and instead of citing sources they are systematicaly cleared. Could you please look into it? Your response is appreciated. I will add the fact tag once again after this post, lets see how long it will take until it is reverted Aristovoul0s 16:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

of coarse not[edit]

Why would I do that? Just because I can? Nah. Your a pal, so I couldn't kill you off. Who else would I have join my acadamy? Aristovou10s? No way. Darthan the destroyer 14:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice choice of section though. I like Star Wars, you put on Star Trek. Same person as above.

Oh and just so I don't forget, what would you like to be known as? A jedi, Sith, Grey Jedi, or someone I met just because they were there?

Ok, i got your new name.

On Brigitte Mohnhaupt image[edit]

I had noticed that this image had at one time been in the English version of wikipedia but could not find it referred to by any existing article on either Brigitte Mohnhaupt or of the terrorist organization that she had been a part of. I had guessed that its absence might have been caused by removal due to a flawed arguement on its liscening being asserted. I found the image on a German newspaper site and noted that they got the image from a german language site dedicated to chronicling the terrorist attacks of the 1970s. As I do not speak German I thought it best to credit the sites involved and make a fair use arguement. If a German speaker knows that such images have been placed in the public domain than that should prevail for liscencing which would allow the image's use more freely across wikipedia.--Wowaconia 01:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]