sorry about that my falt
sorry about that my falt
Alright, that's why. I really wondered why my edits were not visible, I thought something's wrong with wiki. I wonder if you have checked the page, but still I am new here and you have a solid profile. :) So yeah, I trust your judgement on this.
current king of Kumaon
Tried to be civil and gave you a link so that, things can be sorted out by discussion.
You were not ready for the same.
I do not intend to but, I foresee the further discussion not being so civil with you.
If there is any more deletion than, I will surely not be so happy
Matt Damon GA Reassessment
Matt Damon, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Please desist from reverting the anon edits to Jeremy Siegel and read WP:EW. You will be temporarily blocked if you continue – should be blocked now if I follow the letter of the
@Apparition11: I have blocked and noted 2 IPs (though he seems to easily hop to new ones) and have protected the page from non-autoconfirmed users. Stronger protection can be considered if he gets around that. The proper action in this situation really is to call in administrator help to put an end to the pointless and otherwise endless rounds of edits. --Kbh3rdtalk 04:53, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
@Apparition11: Okay, I didn't see your admin request, just having stumbled upon the situation by looking at recent changes. As I read the guidance, though, I think the proper action would be to ask for help and then step back rather than continual reverting. The 3RR rule seems to apply to all editors equally. Maybe more leniency for dealing with obvious malfeasance; haven't scanned WP:EW that closely myself. And, frankly, my use of and familiarity with admin functions is a bit stale, taking an extended break from most of that sort of stuff while continuing to make more pedestrian contributions to Wikipedia and to Commons. --Kbh3rdtalk 05:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Pink Floyd - The Endless River - Reception Section
The newer and updated critical reviews are in for The Endless River album and now the band has reached favorable status with Metacritic and the press. I believe the changes I have made recently are accurate and should now be allowed on the page.
GillyGish (talk) 07:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC) I edited the info box of a page. But since I didn't check the preview of it after saving it, info box has disappeared and all the other symbols and text which must not appear has appeared. As a new user I have no idea about this.