Stop getting rid of the redirects. -WarthogDemon 17:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Darkrai. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -WarthogDemon 17:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are violating 3RR by getting rid of merges that was a result of several weeks discussion, and are continuing to do so. Please stop. I like Darkrai too but you are not helping. -WarthogDemon 18:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to List of Pokémon (481-493), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm not going to continue this 3RR war with you. Next revert gets reported. -WarthogDemon 18:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They alredy have the info boxes on the articles; they're just smaller/cleaner than the previous ones. -WarthogDemon 18:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I may have been a little too harsh, however the edits you made (while not necessarily vandal-edits) should not be made with out an appropriate discussion on the talk page(s). -WarthogDemon 20:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Edit summaries like this are a violation of WP:NPA and will not be tolerated. Stop this behavior immediately or you will be blocked. Dina 19:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism and abusive edit summaries on a massive scale. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Sockpuppetry: sock of User:Worldatlas1989. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
it's unfair, i had permission, their are alot of admins have fair use images on their user page.
Decline reason:
Permission is not available to have fair-use images in user space. It is a violation of our policy. — Yamla 17:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Darkrai. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -WarthogDemon 17:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
