User talk:Cunado19/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive1[edit]

Bahá'í Faith[edit]

With that said, if you want to rename an article, go to the article and click on the Move link at the top. Type the new title in the box, check the box that says "Move Talk page" (at least I suggest always moving the Talk page), and hit Move Page. As long as the page you're moving it to doesn't exist (or does exist but is only a redirect and has no previous edits besides that), then the page will be moved / renamed.

Creating redirects is even simpler. Just go to the page that you want to redirect to another page, clear out whatever's in the content box (if anything, and it goes without saying that any real content should be moved / merged somewhere) and insert the following:

#REDIRECT [[Name of article you're linking to]]

Hope this helps!--MikeJ9919 07:17, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Baha'i pages[edit]

Hi nice to see someone adding stuff in. Just a couple of notes:

When you're writting a new page such as Baha'i statistics or Baha'i pioneering, include diacritical marks. I'll move them now so not a big problem but its the page title.

Try and use section headings - especially on new pages. It shows you where the page can be expanded, and reads a LOT easier in the long run. Oh and if needs padding out then add {{Bahá'í-stub}}. Its just a sign that its not complete and hopefully someone can come along and help out at some point.

Happy hunting on the Baha'i pages... -- Tomhab 12:05, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Where did you get the bit about Dayyán being assassinated during the time of Baha'u'llah's absense? I'm not doubting it, but genuine curiosity. I had been researching a little into him a while ago - you know how each party (Yahya and Baha) claim each other were behind the killing him etc (and I think some polemic claim it was a joint effort), but wasn't aware that it was during this period. Also didn't know he was the the cousin of the bab.

By the way - link to Dayyán (or Dayyan if you're feeling lazy). I wrote a small bit about him a while ago. I'd change the link now, but I'm a little worried you may be mid edit. -- Tomhab 5 July 2005 16:32 (UTC)

  • Cough, choke* expand Dayyán? I'm not sure how many people actually look at that article to be honest. About the only thing I can think of is adding about how close Dayyán was the to Báb (he was intrusted with much of his works - was he his ammenuensis for a while?). -- Tomhab 6 July 2005 01:14 (UTC)

Mirza Yahya[edit]

Just a kind of opinion but about 3 months ago I decided to make a concerted effort not to use two names for a single person so stopped using Mirza Yahya and started using Subh-i Azal. The basic reason is that was the name most often used and it makes it clear that Azalis follow Azal.

Obviously its up to you, but I reckon it makes sense. I was just a little worried that the reader may be confused (notice we never use Ali-Muhammad for the Bab or Husayn-Ali for Baha'u'llah). -- Tomhab 8 July 2005 09:46 (UTC)

Lots of edits[edit]

I see you're doing very well with your edits. Nice to see someone putting a lot of effort into it all. Keep up the work. I've just moved out of my house (and in limbo until I sort myself out with a job and stuff) so only making tidbits edits for now. Drop me a message if you need any help with particularly troublesome debates or help with wikipedia administration stuff. -- Tomhab 21:06, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No life eh?[edit]

Hmmm Well, I've improved - I used to check over and change almost every single edit on the Baha'i pages, but I've improved (although I notice that I was online when I received your message)...

There is actually already a page thats relevant - Wikipedia:Wikipediholic and Wikipedia:Are You a Wikipediholic Test. I don't dare take part in the test.

Interestingly, if it does get deleted, you can hold your claim to having got something in the Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense pages - some of that stuff is legendary. -- Tomhab 16:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've been around a bit longer - you pick this stuff up. Also I've been a bit more active on the non-Baha'i pages. Occasionally you'll see Rick Boatright around - he's one who really knows his stuff :) -- Tomhab 16:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shaykh Ahmad[edit]

I don't really know that much about it. I read a polemic text (by Maulana) which covers it reasonably. Obviously its polemic, but I noticed that they start accurate, then their accuracy drops so no real reason to doubt the early years.

Theres one key thing you've missed out on , which I'll mention in a bit when I get myself sorted - about him being the "Gate" (or Bab) to 12th Imam. As such Siyyid Kazim was the second Bab, and the Bab was the third. -- Tomhab 14:59, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I'm not sure - The Bab may have named his predecessors "Babs".... have to keep reading -- Tomhab 15:12, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah you're right, but I was refering to the claim that Shaykh Ahmad was a Bab. I've rewritten some of the article now. From what I've seen, Shaykh Ahmad and Siyyid Kazim never called themselves Bab but the Bab refered to them as Babs. Obviously the Bab meaning gate refers to their "gate of communication" to the 12th Imam Mahdi. In case you're wondering it reflects the Bab's three claims:

  1. 1844 - The Bab, gate to the Mahdi (same station as Shaykh Ahmad and Siyyid Kazim)
  2. The Mahdi returned (not sure of the date, but I might be able to find out.
  3. 1848 - Manifestation of God

each being higher than the previous, but he kept the name the Bab it seems. -- Tomhab 15:58, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What part of what I'd written was dubious?? -- Tomhab 21:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another image[edit]

I've just noticed that I've written almost everything in your talk page - oh well...

Image:Greatestname.jpg - Do you know the source (where you downloaded it or if its your own image?). I'm trying to add the copyright info to the Baha'i images -- Tomhab 20:22, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SE and MR[edit]

Shoghi Effendi and Mason Remey. Wyss 14:35, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


I like the Mosque that you've made, and I would like to use it at the Danish version of Wikipedia too. However to make that happend, I'll have to upload it at commons, and reading the "no copyright", doesn't make me too sure what specific copyright tag to use. Could you help with this by adding some tag regarding it's copyright? (Such as {{GFDL}}, {{PD}} or whatever you want). -- Karl Meier 09:05, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic[edit]

There are many ways to do it; I find it easiest to use HTML entities, rather than raw UTF8. I have a "Gawk" command-line program which transforms ASCII plain-text to a sequence of HTML entities, but there are a lot of fancier ways of doing it if you want to see Arabic script as you actually type. I've studied Arabic, but am not really a speaker... AnonMoos 17:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC) الناموس[reply]

99 names of Allah[edit]

Hi Cunado, the point I was making was that on this topic 99 Names of Allah, if you look at the Medi section, he is talking about Bahá'í faith I think that reference should be removed as people could get confused. As far as I know, Bahá'í are not Muslims nor a sect of Islam. So its pretty stupid making a to them in the said article.

P.S, I like your style I'm actually a fan of yours lol. ;-)


--Street Scholar 20:12, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

I guess you are right.[edit]

OK, we will leave it as its, you have a valid point.

--Street Scholar 20:14, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

Evolution theory[edit]

Yes, I deleted it. I didn't know how to format everything. plus the title was wrong too. It would have probably been better if it said various evolution theories in Islam.

covenant-breaker, huh?[edit]

I heard there was a covenant-breaker in Shanghai. [unsigned by User:W778]

bryan, bryan, bryan...[edit]

Everyone knows about you being a covenant-breaker! I even met your grandmother, Beth M. She refuses to see you now because you have become a covenant-breaker. [unsigned by User:W778]

Actually my grandmother is Zeta, but thanks for trying. Stop vandalyzing my talk page. Cuñado - Talk 08:49, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you just edit your own page?[edit]

Bryan,

I see you have already tried to edit your own page to look like a "good" Baha'i but I have already sent your name, location, photo, and quote, "My first timid edit was on 17 June 2005, and before a month passed I wreaked havoc on the Bahá'í pages with a few hundred edits. Now they're looking much better." to a friend of mine in Macau. I think they should know what you are doing to the Faith on the internet.

I will let them determine what is to be done about your actions. If you are not a covenant-breaker, you sure seem like one. I hope I am wrong. [unsigned by User:W778]

So you are not the person I thought you were, but...[edit]

Bryan,

There is a covenant-breaker in Shanghai, but I just realized it can't be you because you have only been in China for 6 months, so you are not the person I thought you were, but why do you seem to be doing the work of so many covenant-breakers on the net? The internet is the most public place, so why do you post Baha'u'llahs photo there. I know you have read the Lights of Guidance regarding this because you sent me the quote, but did you read it carefully? His image is not to be viewed in public. You are not helping any by posting it again and again. I have not sent that letter to Macau yet. I am willing to over-look this if you stop posting His photo. P.S. After reading this you can edit your own "talk" page to exclude all my messages. [unsigned by User:W778]