This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→BWilkins←track) 11:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
With no evidence except for what I wrote on DeFacto's talk page and on the ANI. I've never been on this side of that fence before. I am certainly not DeFacto, as I made clear on the ANI, I am however someone else too, for the reason I explained. This is indeed a worrying use of admin powers. DaftEco (talk) 13:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We use the WP:DUCK test a lot. The evidence as it stands is pretty cut and dry. If you think it's in error, read WP:GAB/WP:EVADE/WP:SOCK and convince the community otherwise - to me, it was apparent and obvious. Of course, if you looked objectively at it, you would see the same thing. (talk→BWilkins←track) 13:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
