User talk:Debashish/Archives/2007/April

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Inklog

There are notability guidelines on Wikipedia. From my research, I found no evidence that Inklog should have its own article on Wikipedia. That's the reason for my deletion. If you feel the subject is notable, then provide evidence showing reliable sources that demonstrate the notability of this new phenomenon. Know that any article on Wikipedia must meet notability guidelines, and articles are not deleted because someone arbitrarily feels it is not worthy for an article. Nishkid64 (talk) 14:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for taking so long to respond. Anyway, I was looking for reliable sources (news sources is a good example) dealing with Inklogs and I really couldn't find anything. If you don't have any reliable sources, then the contents of the article can easily be contented at any time. Unless you can show me sources such as those seen at WP:RS, then I don't believe the article should be undeleted for now. Nishkid64 (talk) 20:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)