User talk:Frytskyy

Welcome!

Hello, Frytskyy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Vladonai Software, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bihco (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladonai Software[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vladonai Software requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bihco (talk) 05:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of AllMyNotes Organizer[edit]

I have nominated AllMyNotes Organizer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AllMyNotes Organizer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ArcAngel (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Laurent (talk) 15:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 15:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AllMyNotes Organizer[edit]

A tag has been placed on AllMyNotes Organizer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 20:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frytskyy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've realized that I was acting wrong, and will not do that again, in my excuse I can only say that I didn't realized how my actions will look like

Decline reason:

No convincing reasons given for unblock. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So far, all of your edits have been related to your own software, and "I will not do that again" is not specific about what you aren't going to do again. What kinds of edits would you make if unblocked? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC) Frytskyy (talk) 19:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's true that I've started my participation in Wikipedia because I have personal interest. Why? Because I can see all my competitors here. Now, once I'm blacklisted, the easiest thing would be to just go. But that would mean that you are right, and I'm a bad guy, I believe it's not true, my intent wasn't bad - look at my action, aftrall, I've removed all advertisement from the article. Now I see that to be listed in wikipedia, I don't have to care about it, other people will do that once my product will be famous. Will I participate in wikipedia? To be honest, don't know, but chances are. Previously I was participating in it - edited couple of articles, at that time there was no need to register, I didn't cared, just contributed, rarely, from time to time. Now you can kick me out, for caring for my own business. But consider this - I wasn't rude, I din't ruined any article, just added my own, whick looks as advert to you... well... sad... competitors have articles about them, I cannot have any... allright...

There's nothing personal. No one has accused you of being rude, or of ruining any article. But Wikipedia is not a business directory, and under the conflict of interest guidelines, we all agree to avoid writing about ourselves and our own businesses. Since you were writing about your business, and didn't stop when we asked, we had to block, because it was the only way of stopping you. If, someday, you become interested in volunteering to help write the encyclopedia, though, we'll be happy to have your help, and welcome your request for unblocking. It will help, though, if there's some indication that you understand why we avoid writing about our own businesses. I block dozens of users like you every day, and so do hundreds of other admins. If we allowed this, Wikipedia would soon stop being an encyclopedia and become a collection of advertisements for businesses that aren't notable, written by the owners of those businesses. I don't think it's such a bad thing, that in the great big internet there is an encyclopedia that tries to be neutral and include only noteworthy subjects. There is a site that is exactly what you're looking for- it's WikiCompany. You could check it out, if you like. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:45, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]