User talk:GodofFacts

February 2021[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ohrid, you may be blocked from editing. Macedonian (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GodofFacts, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ohrid. Macedonian (talk) 06:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Newslinger talk 14:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GodofFacts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sadly the people reporting me are Greeks. My family is from Ohrid I am 42 years old this year my father turned 70 and We know what Ohrid is about. The prespa agreement was a simple corrupt agenda by zaev to get a cash grab from the greek goverment. Macedonia was a republic upto 2019 and this is what i was editing, however a greek was not happy and had all macedonian sites on notice so if you touch it then he reports. What evidence does he have that Macedonia was not a republic prior to 2019. It is fact. Wikipedia is written by amateurs who have political agendas. In tertiary and secondary education it is a running joke that Wikipedia is a poor source to quote facts and would actually result in Fails of projects and thesis. I have a Bach Sci. Bio Edu. Dip Ed. and i would never ever accept wikipedia information as an educator.

GodofFacts (talk) 10:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You shouldn't accept Wikipedia information as an educator, as Wikipedia is not a reliable source. We know that, and agree, because Wikipedia summarizes independent reliable sources, it is not a source itself- so it isn't a "joke", it's very true. What you don't know is the nationality of the people on the other end of the computer- and it seems that your nationalism is too strong to be able to edit about Macedonian issues. You will either need to agree to edit in other topic areas, or explain how you will set your nationalism aside to the extent necessary to collaborate with other users. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.