User talk:Jus' Trollin'

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

<huge>Resolve this soon or I'll make another account.</huge>

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jus' Trollin' (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What Vandalism? I don't understand how putting that a picture of a Women was a picture of a woman in the summary was vandalism. I think that I have been blocked wrongly. And the username was a joke. Furthermore, It is not apparent that my Account is used only for vandalism, since I have made one edit. One. Please review this in a timely manner also. Nice way to greet new members...

Decline reason:

You were blocked as much for your username as for your edit. As first edits go, it seems pretty innocuous. However, your username is not compatible with the collegiate editing environment that we are seeking to foster here. If you wish to edit Wikipedia constructively, you are welcome to do so with a new account. As for your last remark... please read the short essay at WP:BITECLUB. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 18:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At first glance, the edit does seem innocuous, but in reality it is a complete change in the meaning of the lead sentence. Originally, the artwork was executed around 1640, but this user changed it to mean that the woman was executed around 1640. Here we have a trolling sneaky vandal. One that threatened to create socks, I might add. —DoRD (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]