User talk:MarkA12

Please refrain from using sensationalim in Wikipedia article like you did for your edit of Serie A 2006-07. Wikipedia is an encylopedia. If you want to express you're own views on a subject please keep it to internet forums or blogs. Niall123 12:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Niall123, are you objecting to my moving the point about the cessation of play to the top? That is clearly the most vital piece of information regarding the current season. I agree with what I think you're saying -- that it is very unfortunate. Nonetheless, it did happen, and if you're writing an article about the current season, I think it's the most important thing to say right now and therefore belongs at the top. Once play begins again, it should move down. On my other edits, the removal of the point penalties, perhaps you're right. It was a difficult paragraph to follow, so I tried to clean it up. Taking out the details about the penalties was not done with bad intent, but perhaps it was hasty. Can we work out a way to improve how it reads while also keeping the details in there, if you feel that they are important? On the addition of the Reuters article, I did float that idea on the talk page first, and got no objections, so I include it in this round of edits. I have no objection to its removal if it is controversial in your mind. If you'd like, we can move this discussion to the talk page there. Just let me know. I'm a relative newbie here, and I am just getting my feet wet. I didn't mean to tackle with my cleats up on this one!--MarkA12 15:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Niall123, please see additional comment on your talk page. Best, --MarkA12 16:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Socionomics[edit]

Hello MarkA12,

I appreciated your comments in the RfD. It's not over, by the way. I'm going to request that the socionomics article be undeleted, and I think my arguments will be even stronger now than before. You'll have the opportunity to vote again, and this time it may even count.

I'm a big believer in Wikipedia, and I was before I ever started posting here. But I understand your being discouraged. Stick around. A more just outcome for socionomics may help improve your perspective. Thanks again, --Rgfolsom 04:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I'm done. See the note to me on user:Sandstein. I guess the presumption of innocence is too important to me (bloody American). As far as I know this is the first time the very act of trying to do things right has gotten me accused of fakery! Well, my wife will be glad that this little phase is done. Best wishes to you for a better outcome.--MarkA12 09:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]