User talk:MavereX

Editing for the Open Mind.

July 2008[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks, you will be blocked from editing. Do not remove cited material and then claim the article has an unbalanced point of view. Please read the arbitration decision regarding this article—specifically, how promotion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories are to be discounted and may result in being topic-banned or blocked from editing. If you have any issues with the neutrality of the page, take them up in the talk page. This is your only warning. VegitaU (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edit? HAHAHA Yes disruptive to the official view which has more holes than the USS Liberty[1]

Help[edit]

Hi. If there are any specific changes you would like to make, I could try to help. Beyond that, I don't really have much time to spend on Wikipedia. And, on that one article, it could take weeks to get any change through. They will likely ban you and me both before we come anywhere near getting anything done. —Slipgrid (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:VegitaU, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Veggy (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, it's Air Force Airman, not soldier. Just thought I'd clue you in. -- Veggy (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MavereX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Nowhere did I harass him.. Go ahead.. look.. This is nonsense, he just did that because he does not agree with my POV.

Decline reason:

Edits such as this are completely unacceptable. Please control yourself when your block expires. Kuru ^talk 03:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FWIW, saying I blocked you because I don't agree with your point of view is blatantly false and can also be viewed as a personal attack. Consider yourself lucky the block has not been extended to prevent further attacks. Toddst1 (talk) 15:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]