User talk:NamelessCowardice

Hello. Please do not assume bad faith re: my everson vote. I think my points speak for themselves. Additionally, I voted 'keep' on the ED article because it had been through the process twice already and was kept, yet the only content change was a single image. If you're unsure of my intent, you'll notice I did not participate AT ALL in the edit warring and insanity. Neither in the article nor the AfD for reference --Bouquet 22:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bouquet, There's nothing to see here, this is just some sockpuppet created less than two hours ago just to vandalize. --SayWhatYouMeanAndMeanWhatYouSay 23:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. {SayWhatYouMeanAndMeanWhatYouSay|SayWhatYouMeanAndMeanWhatYouSay|22:35, 23 July 2006}

Vandalism of Michael Everson vote for deletion (2nd nomination)

In the same manner I haven't marked the Keeps "Possible bad faith support" (and a lot of them are personal friends of his, so yeah they kind of are) you don't get to vandalize VfD like that. Keep it on topic or I'll have a great case to have you and your IP banned. {SayWhatYouMeanAndMeanWhatYouSay|SayWhatYouMeanAndMeanWhatYouSay|22:35, 23 July 2006}