User talk:Narmeenseo

February 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Social media, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 10:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung Galaxy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Archer1234 (t·c) 11:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Narmeenseo! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Samsung Galaxy that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Archer1234 (t·c) 11:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Dress shirt. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Archer1234 (t·c) 11:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Smart casual, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Archer1234 (t·c) 12:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Women's tennis. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Archer1234 (t·c) 12:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)