User talk:Oistean

Dear Oistean, I appreciate your efforts of some articles about Transilvanian bishops. Please note of the following:

- the template "Expand Romanian" shall be used when a full text is translated by Romanian or it still contain Romanian text, this is not the case, the article being self-supporting by its own ref. In this case this template is not appropriate.

- there is no need to add information which are not required or simply can be reach following the wiki-links. Once you write the birth place with its link, it is enough. You can add the nation (Transilvania is the best choice IMHO) but adding other information (as the county, Romanian form of the name, ect) is useless and against the policies of wiki. See for example WP:LINKCRISIS Reader who is interested can simply follow the link.

- the same for adding too much information as the name in Hungarian. Why not also in Latin or in German? The form of the names is very similar in the various version, so there is no need. PS: Bob and Lemeni spoke Romanian and were strictly pro-Romanian, Bizanczy spoke Ukrainan and fought against the Hungarian bishop of Eger for all his life: all these people worked hard during all their life to underline their difference with neighbourgs. The fact that their territories were for about 200 years under the personal Habsburg crown dont make them Hungarian people.

- the Lead section shall as lean as possible. see WP:LEAD. Possible details, if needed, on birth-places ect shall go in the "life" section. Birth place is already give two times: on life section, and in infobox: it is useless to add it to "lead Section"

- these articles are not "stub", having enough text and references

PS: there are so many articles to be translated from Romanian or Hungarian: you are welcome to help. Thanks A ntv (talk) 06:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)