User talk:Phantomwolf13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're doing wonderfully, Phantomwolf13! Very nice work. In your paragraphs concerning the environmental policies of the Republicans and Democrats, it would be useful to have some information on what those policies actually set in motion. For instance, the "Clear Skies Act," what does it really mean for the environment, for emissions standards, etc.? You should be proud of your useful contributions to open-source media. Keep up the good work. Mcwabaunsee 21:58, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your environmental edits are very good, Phantomwolf. Watch out for point-of-view statements and subjective language ("better" etc.). However, the environmental section you've contributed to the Republic Party article seems only to repeat that party's position, as they've stated it. Remember the purpose of the task force is to provide an unbiased view and promote greater transparency.

Same goes for the Democratic Party entry. Perhaps these sections could be divided into multiple units, say, a "Platforms" section, as the parties articulate those, a section titled "Records," etc. Mcwabaunsee 02:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your useful contributions to the world-wide encyclopedia! Mcwabaunsee 02:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added the new page to my sandbox and on the wikipedia. I could not find a new one on the environmental task force but instead did an article on a local group concerned with the environment. Hope you like it. Phantomwolf13 (talk) 23:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Concerned Citizens of Platte County has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG. Only source is the organization's website. A WP:BEFORE search reveals nothing sufficient to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]