User talk:Ratnahastin

Emergency user slap button

Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (direct link)
Editors can a malfunctioning user to Wikipedia talk:Village stocks.

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Ratnahastin! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:54, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Your recent editing history at List of largest funerals shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Nobody is trying to impose their version except for your insistence on reverting changes until you decide. Two users (myself included) contributed to discussion on the talk page before you made your latest edit warring reversion, and yet you have not responded. You have had several days to contribute, and that is why you are now being warned: constantly reverting to your preferred version by saying that changes need discussing, while not actually contributing to discussion, is disruptive. Kingsif (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I will reiterate this warning to you. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

331dot Can you clarify? I am not edit warring. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

There is a slow burning edit war at List of largest funerals. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

331dot But that edit war ended like almost 2 weeks ago. While I would thank you for reverting this abusive IP, I would still say that you got it wrong that Kingsif is socking. He is not. This abusive IP has a history of trolling a number of editors on here and I just got his most recent IP blocked for socking.Ratnahastin (talk) 15:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)