User talk:SabrinaRoseLee

Hi Sabrina! My name is Jesus and my pronouns are he/him. Jbazan424 (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Cbrinkle (talk) 22:36, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Suitability Analysis 1st Draft

→Citations:

Ascough, J. C., Rector, H. D., Hoag, D. L., McMaster, G. S., Vandenberg, B. C., Shaffer, M. J., Weltz, M. A., and Ahuja, L. R., “Multicriteria Spatial Decision Support Systems: Overview, Applications, and Future Research Directions,” Proc. Integrated Assessment and Decision Support, 175 (2002).

Jankowski, Piotr, and L. Richard. "Integration of GIS-based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in a spatial decision support system for route selection." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 21.3 (1994): 323-340.

Malczewski, Jacek. "GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview." Progress in planning 62.1 (2004): 3-65. Suitability analysis for enhancing wildlife habitat in the Yolo Basin Jones & Stokes Associates.; Central Valley Habitat Joint Venture.; California Wetlands Foundation.1994

Wutthigrai Boonsuk ; Chris Harding; Possibility space for GIS suitability analysis. Proc. SPIE 9017, Visualization and Data Analysis 2014, 90170R (December 23, 2013); doi:10.1117/12.2040165.''

→Rough Draft

Section— Possibility Space

The Possibility Space is a framework that allows for the analysis of all possible consequences and benefits of a suitability analysis. This is created through geometrical data analysis conducted in real time with technological land mapping, allowing for the development of multiple combinations of suitability. Physically it is a visual interactive database that allows for a holistic composition of suitability.

Land-Use Suitability Analysis

Land-use suitability analysis requires the use of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) in order to survey geographical suitability. This process can be viewed through the techno-positivist and the socio-political, public engagement perspectives. There has been critique in the role that both of these aspects of careful spatial planning entail. The instrumental approach to spatial analysis can either be seen as a tool, or as a the main plan when it comes to suitability. This brings up the theoretical questions of space, place, and the social construction of both. Needless to say, both the social and the physical aspects of space are necessary to conduct a holistic suitability analysis.

Addition of “Wildlife” to GIS Applications—

The identification of physical structures natural habitats, and the relationship between the two and the environmental impacts of that. This allows for the optimization between the relationship of enhancing wildlife while also allowing for man made development. SabrinaRoseLee (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Rough Draft Peer Edit

I think these are good additions to the wikipedia article, however, relating back to the guidelines of wikipedia, I think you should refrain from making claims. According to Wikipedia guidelines and the rules we have been told to follow, analysis of specific information should not be included based on your own views. For example, when you stated that both "social and physical aspects of space are necessary" in the section of Land-Use Suitability, who states this? I agree that it is, but someone could argue the opposite. Therefore, you should try to remain neutral and just present the facts. Also the citations you have, where do they belong? Put them in the sentences. But so far, really good. Jbazan424 (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)