User talk:JarrahTree/Archive06

Buddhism

I am quite happy for the article to be edited by a Tibetanist, or anyone else who knows what they are talking about. Vandalism will of course be reverted. Adam 09:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got the idea from the fact that people frequently clutter articles with non-PD photos. My comment was not aimed at you personally, since I know nothing about you. Adam 09:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well I will rename the article and someone else can do parallel articles for other parts of the Buddhist world. Adam 11:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kopkunkap, khop-jai, arigato etc. Adam 12:11, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swan Coastal Plain

Hey dude, I've been slacking getting back to people this week - busy one in RL. To be honest it was just a random edit, at the minute I'm concentrating on photos. I still have old pics I need to get into commons and going forward I'll be taking as many as I can around Perth for various suburbs and other srticles. If there is a Perth related article you want a pic for let me know and I'll see what I can do. I can only get out at the weekend - but if I know someone has a pic in mind that gives me a focus too. Regards. SeanMack 14:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Should explain really - I'm stuck in the 'burbs near South street, and being a paddy and only here a year those shots might be beyond my Perth geographical ability to get to the places.... I'm in town the odd time and can take shots there- but defo if I'm in areas you mentioned I'll do my best to get a shot. All the best SeanMack 13:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Duracks

I think I'm distantly related to them, so perhaps I can get my name in Wikipedia! -- Ian ≡ talk 12:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Be Bold!

Satusoro, I hope you won't mind me saying this but I don't see why you have to leave a rude message on my TalkPage in order to do any number of edits you feel need to be made. Everyone on Wikipedia is free to do that editing, with the caveat that their work can be edited without mercy. If you wish to be bold, fine. You don't need my blessing. Just don't pontificate and do nothing. --Daniel 17:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your latest comment on my Talk Page: however enthusiastic I was in choosing/defending the choice of Indonesian Civil War does not make you any less able to propose a change.

Nevertheless, I knew that the choice was going to raise some hackles from any number of sides - so there are a good number of redirects to Indonesian Civil War, including G30S and G30S PKI (as far as I know, the most commonly used name for the time period/conflict).

If there are other suggestions, then I'd like to hear them. But I do find it a personal annoyance to be criticized for trying to do something, without any particular guidance as to what the alternatives may be. --Daniel 04:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]