User talk:Seoul1978

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Multiple accounts[edit]

The investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rezameyqani has confirmed that you created other accounts in violation of Wikipedia policy, and that you logged out to edit-war. Although I've blocked the other accounts, this account may edit, since it is the oldest. If you do this again, or if you edit from an IP to avoid scrutiny, I will block accordingly and will block this account as well. Acroterion (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fields Medal page[edit]

Hello there,We are pleased that you are interested in editing of fields medal page.currently,a discussion is ongoing about editing the fields medalist table.please join our conversation,before editing the page.Thanks.Rezameyqani (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a considerable consensus on the table format in the talk page,and we are currently dicussing on replacing the current table with a new one,please do not engage in edit warring.ThanksRezameyqani (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion (talk) 13:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seoul1978 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My edit is not vandalism. User:Rezameyqani violated 3rr first.

Decline reason:

You are blocked for edit warring, and this is what you must address in any future unblock request. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:52, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"Someboody else did it first" is not an excuse, and you reverted more than one editor and far exceeded 3 reverts. I blocked you because you have aggressively edit-warred and used sockpuppets to avoid scrutiny, and because you never participated in the consensus-building discussion on the article talkpage. If you insist on edit-warring and never discussing, you may expect to be blocked. You were clearly warned right at the top of this page. Acroterion (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]