User talk:Sr2020

Welcome!

Hello, Sr2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Natasha michels, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jimmy Pitt talk 13:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Natasha michels[edit]

A tag has been placed on Natasha michels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jimmy Pitt talk 13:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've placed the content in a sandbox at User:Sr2020/sandbox for you to develop. Please read WP:ARTIST for notability guidelines. Acroterion _(talk) 14:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reference you provided does not actually mention Natasha Michels; is there a different page you're trying to link to? Also, nomination for an award, or simple exhibition, does not meet WP:ARTIST, and "aspiring" implies that the subject has not reached a significant status. Acroterion _(talk) 14:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention," through the month of late novemeber ealryd ecemebr he rwork was featured in the main foyer as the main artworks. and artist of the eyar in australia not signifciant critical attention? seriously ease up

The main foyer of where? What exhibition? MCA? There are no references that I can find to this artist. All information must be verifiable; pllease provide verifiable references. The person was not"artist of the year", but was only, according to your assertion, nominated for "New artist of the year", something quite different, and did not, apparently, win the award. Acroterion _(talk) 14:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

msucuem of contempery , the brids can talk: a collection seletece dby natasha michels. main section of their collection exhibition. no they didnt win but they were highly noted on a national sclae which is undeniably sisgnificant critial attnetion. so i fial to see how u can rightly keep deleting it

How were the noted? In newspapers? That would eb great - please provide a link to the newspaper articles. Otherwise, it's just your assertion. I'll look through the MCA site some more: I'm not finding it. :Additionally, please be aware that, apart from notability, all biographical articles are required to provide verifiable sources, or they will be deleted within a week. Acroterion _(talk) 15:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

noted in the program/book issued annually by the MCA ill see i fi can go refind it

That would be helpful. At this point, I would say that, since you've made a reasonably credible assertion (though unsourced) of notability, the article shouldn't be speedy-deleted, but it may be the subject of a formal deletion discussion, which will require sources to back up the notability claim. Please see what you can find. Acroterion _(talk) 15:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natasha michels[edit]

The article Natasha michels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ARTIST, no evidence of satisfying WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hqb (talk) 08:13, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Natasha michels[edit]

I have nominated Natasha michels, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha michels. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hqb (talk) 13:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for email address[edit]

Hello, Sr2020 … you asked for my email address at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha michels … if you had any sense at all, you would have followed the links on my user page to The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk · contribs), where you will find an E-mail this user link … too bad YOU haven't provided one, so now this message will be public.

Learn the difference between "your" and "you're".
Learn to use a spell-check on your postings.
Stop calling people "quite ignorant" simply because they disagree with you.
Start leaving an edit summary when you edit (articles & user pages).
Sign your posts so that a bot doesn't have to do it.

So far, all of your posts have identified you as someone who lacks a high school level of English education, which means that you are either very young, or else you are not very very smart … be careful that you don't alienate more editors, or else your comments will be increasingly ignored.

Happy Editing! — 70.21.13.215 (talk · contribs) _{12:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

one it was sarcasm obviously u are to oblivious to relise. two system of langugae is no constraint to meaning, the words and letters do not form words but the meaning behind them, one doe snot need to spell type correctly to convey meaning and nor should they have to, one should not confirm to the narks of society.and the fact u think im claling people ignorant because they disagree with me jsut proves my point and ur ingorance oh yes i spelt it wrong as many ther words but u get the main idea.

also i was born raised and eductaed in sri lankan as a child and did not ifnact recieve much english education ua re correct, but ur comments are extremely offensive. because i dont ahve an english education i am very veyr young or very evyr stupid wlel screw u you racist english imperialist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr2020 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 20 July 2010

July 2010[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

go post this on 70.21.13.215 not mine ty

In case you weren't sure why you got the warning, writing "screw u you racst english imperialist" is a personal attack, and I've seen people be blocked for less. Cut it out and stick to writing an encyclopedia. The-Pope (talk) 08:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i apologise for gettting offended by racists remarks directed at me your such a saint for helping me out oh why thankyou kind sir *bows*

all racism aside is not which means that "you are either very young, or else you are not very very smart" is that not a personal attack and is why i told u to post it on there wall not mine.

Someone else has already done that. Two wrongs don't make a right - and as the other guy claims to be African American, I think your accusation of "English imperialist racism" wasn't correct. The fact remains though that your spelling is atrocious and is often not suitable for inclusion in the English wikipedia. It doesn't meant that you can not contribute - you should however try to use a spell checker (firefox/chrome etc have a built in one - and the red squiggly line helps me out all the time and I'm a native speaker of English) or other method of ensuring that when you do press "save page", it is as correct as it can possibly be. The-Pope (talk) 16:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

who said an african american cant be an english imperialist another racist remark once again found on wikipedia well done guys