User talk:StonedBushby

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. Philip Gronowski ^Contribs 21:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StonedBushby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a young Canadian who just joined Wiki and believe that I am being harassed by fellow Canadians. As you can see I made ONE post. It was deleted and I was blocked. This is clearly unjust and I ask for a reversal immediately please. StonedBushbyStonedBushby 21:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Trolling, vandalism. -- Yamla 21:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

StonedBushby (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Made one post- simply one- and have been accused of many names and now banned. Is this just or is there something here I am missing? I am sure an IP search can clarify this. I am not what I am accused of being. I am a nice person. StonedBushbyStonedBushby 21:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Brand new account leaps into a content dispute where another user was very recently blocked -- a little hard for me to believe, unfortunately. Sorry. Luna Santin 00:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not blank prior unblock requests. These should be left on your page so other administrators reviewing your block can see that you have previously had an unblock reviewed and declined. Thanks. --Yamla 22:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has now been protected because of your bad-faith use of the unblock request. Your unblock request will remain visible for other administrators to review, however. If you are unblocked, this page will be unprotected. --Yamla 22:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]