User talk:The Bodyboard Expert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Praxidicae. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. PICKLEDICAEšŸ„’ 15:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The updates I have created are 100% accurate, and have been done to ensure there is no confusion with the different organisations running the bodyboarding world tour.
I will happily add the references. I really want to ensure that the information around the sport of bodyboarding is as complete and uptodate as possible. This is not advertising, not promotion, it is just factual updates. I plan to add in more information.
I have no reason to use this as spam/promo/advertising etc. Just the facts. Thanks. The Bodyboard Expert (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is promotional about the changes I have made??? Do you know anything about bodyboarding and the current state of the sport?
1. the APB is defunct, has been since end of 2019
2. the IBC took over the tour in 2020
3. Tour didn't run due to COVID
FOR YOUR REF: https://ibcworldtour.com/about-us/
All I am trying to do is ensure the information that is available is correct, factual and upto date. The Bodyboard Expert (talk) 16:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at World Tour (bodyboarding) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editingā€”especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workā€”whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeā€”counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringā€”even if you do not violate the three-revert ruleā€”should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. PICKLEDICAEšŸ„’ 16:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]