User talk:TribalElliot

I'm new to Wikipedia, and so far the experience has been unpleasant at best.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TribalElliot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made several changes, all valid, all contributing to the greatest book of knowledge. And then I get banned by someone named "FisherQueen". This is just ridiculous. Jimmy Wales says, "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet has free access to the sum of all human knowledge." I even almost donated. Well Wales' goal certainly won't come to fruition when users get banned for doing absolutely nothing wrong.

Decline reason:

Pouting will not get you unblocked. Toddst1 (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I blocked you twice. As User:Inktomi67, I blocked you for continuing to remove the deletion template from an article after repeatedly warning you to stop. Then I blocked this account, because the rules do not permit you to use a second account to avoid a block. It would not be accurate to say that your repeated removal of the deletion template was a 'valid change.' This account is permanently blocked, because you do not need two accounts. Your other account is only blocked for a week; long enough to let the deletion discussion in question proceed without further disruption. Reviewing admins, , this person always blanks her talk page when warned, so there are removed warnings in the histories of both pages. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]