User talk:Wahrmund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia:Babel
en This user is a native speaker of English.
de-4
Dieser Benutzer hat Deutschkenntnisse auf muttersprachlichem Niveau.
Search user languages


I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! WLU 23:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

GOCE October 2014 newsletter[edit]

Guild of Copy Editors October 2014 newsletter is now ready for review. Highlights:

– Your project coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978 and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


Spam or not-spam in Parables external link to Secular Parables?[edit]

Hi, Wahrmund: In Parables external links, dated 18:57, 21 October 2013‎, you removed as spam several actual corporate spam links, but also one relevant link (from the pluralistic rationalism society www.circleofreason.org) that posts modern secular parables and fables as a teaching aid. This external link does seem relevant to illustrating the Wikipedia topic of "parables," especially as used as a modern teaching tool, and especially given that the Wikipedia article as now written seems otherwise weighted toward only historical religious parables. I'd argue for the proposition that Wikipedia should restore this (or a similar) source as a relevant link to illustrative modern/secular parables. Your thoughts? Thx, Fhburton (talk) 20:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

  • I have restored the Circle of Reason link. Wahrmund (talk) 21:04, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The inclusion of balanced collections of spiritual and secular parables seems a good addendum, thanks; I will take the initiative of noting the latter as such, rather than solely by the .org's name. You may revert that change if you feel it is less appropriate than your restoration. Thx, Fhburton (talk) 22:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James T. Farrell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''[[Judgment Day (novel)|Judgment Day]]'' (1935) [This is the final part of the [[Studs Lonigan|Studs Lonigan trilogy]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)