User talk:Warzinski

July 2013

Hello, I'm Barek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mint.com, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mint.com, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Quite simply, if you cannot find a third-party reliable source for the issue, it should not be restored to the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mint.com shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Amaury (talk) 19:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mint.com. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
NOTE: Forum postings by users fail to meet the threshold of being a reliable source, and attempting to synthesize those postings to make conclusions in an article is original research. In the thread you linked, the only post flagged as coming from an "official rep" was simply to thank for feedback - not supporting the claims nor conclusions being added to the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)