Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Reedy Bot 1

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Reedy Bot

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Reedy Boy

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Tagging is Automatic, Manual Selection of Pages

Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser with User:Kingboyk's plugin

Function Summary: Tagging Talk Pages under the influence of various WikiProjects.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): As and When - Not every day, but when it is being done, for a few hours in that day

Edit rate requested: 6 per Minute (max)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: As Above. Helping out with talk page tagging using AWB and kingbotk's Plugin.

Samples of Edits are available on this account Special:Contributions/Reedy_Boy.

Will work on categories by request, or categories of articles that are not tagged, but covered by a certain wikiproject.

Discussion

I am an Active AWB developer and also help User:kingboyk out on the development of his plugin. Reedy Boy 21:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Will you be assessing the articles, or just placing the template? —METS501 (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I was planning on just placing the base template, with cat and importance tags. Hence requesting bot status for automatic saving of the edits. Reedy Boy 21:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Make 50-100 edits and make sure there's no problems, the report back. —METS501 (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. =) Reedy Boy 22:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thats 100 new Talk pages tagged, and around 67 with their tag changed. Reedy Boy 00:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

 Approved. This bot shall run with a flag. —METS501 (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Just linking to the first proposal for Reedy Bot and noting that it was withdrawn and not approved. Only to avoid chance for confustion. - Taxman ^Talk 03:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)