Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Geology of the Moon

Geology of the Moon (7 votes in 2 weeks)

Nominated on 23:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC); needs 10 votes by 7 July 2005.

This is a really important topic.

Support:

1. Revolución 23:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
2. Evil Monkey∴Hello 06:10, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
3. Rentastrawberry 03:02, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
4. Jon Harald Søby 14:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
5. RJH 18:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
6. Milena July 5, 2005 11:07 (UTC)
7. 500LL July 6, 2005 11:38 (UTC)

Comments:

• Could you stub it so those considering can judge the subject?

lots of issues | leave me a message 06:44, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• • Anyone here have a big library. This list my be useful. [1] Falphin 21:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

A red link in the heading would have been a lot better than what is on Geology of the Moon now. No article is better than something like that. Jon Harald Søby 14:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. Blank articles are frustrating to users expecting info, unnecessary, inflate the count, and shouldn't exist! If anyone has a confident grasp of this subject - please stub it.

lots of issues | leave me a message 17:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I thought an article had to be so many words before it was counted as an article. Falphin 29 June 2005 20:33 (UTC)

• There is also the option of translating this from the featured article on the spanish Wikipedia es:Geología de la Luna. If this nomination fails, it can be nominated on WP:SPATRA.--Fenice 08:21, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• I found some articles on some lunar rocks in English wikipedia, such as Regolith, Norite, Dacite, Basalt, Gabbro. Not all of the articles on rocks have references to the Moon. KNewman July 1, 2005 11:44 (UTC)

---