Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wrestle Kingdom 9/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Laser brain via FACBot (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2015 [1].
Wrestle Kingdom 9[edit]
- Nominator(s): starship.paint and リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) 01:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article is about... a Japanese professional wrestling show in 2015 that was also broadcast in English in the United States. The premier annual event of the NJPW company, this show was well received by critics, displaying the quality of puroresu. In the last four months, Ribbon Salminen and I have started, DYK-ed and GA-ed the article. This is the first FAC of co-nominator Ribbon Salminen, and my second FAC. My first FAC was not very popular, so I'm willing to exchange reviews for anyone I haven't already given help to. starship.paint ~ KO 01:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking over this page, it looks comprehensive enough. The images are appropriately licensed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Jo-Jo Eumerus - keen eye and nimble fingers to spot and respond thus. Would you be able to fully review / support or oppose the FAC in the near future? starship.paint ~ KO 14:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Prolly yes, but I have another long worklist to work down beforehand. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: understood. I'll hit you up in the latter stages of this discussion, then. Good luck with your work! starship.paint ~ KO 09:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you Jo-Jo Eumerus - keen eye and nimble fingers to spot and respond thus. Would you be able to fully review / support or oppose the FAC in the near future? starship.paint ~ KO 14:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- One preliminary thing I notice: "(although some previous shows have had other names)" does not appear in the source, it seems to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jo-Jo Eumerus: - source added. From 1992 onwards in the source. starship.paint ~ KO 11:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @GaryColemanFan, Freikorp, MPJ-DK, James26, and Wrestlinglover: - all of you helped out in the peer review, for that I thank you again. Given your experience, would you be able to comment on this article's suitability for FAC? starship.paint ~ KO 12:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You mean on the actual Feature Article review? I normally do not comment on wrestling articles there since it is an interest of conflict in my eyes. But if you need a third party to something on the PW standards i would be happy to give input on that. MPJ-US 12:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @MPJ-DK: - this is the actual Feature Article review. Personally, I don't think there's any conflict of interest because you are not a major contributor to the article. In fact, it would be beneficial for you to comment, because you can provide an "expert" point-of-view, especially on the depth of coverage, since you are familiar with PW. Other Wikipedia editors (most of them?) who are not familiar with the PW field provide the "layman" point-of-view. It would be useful to hear from both types of editors would be useful for this Feature Article review. starship.paint ~ KO 09:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I will be able to give some comments but not until the weekend at least.--WillC 21:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It's fine, it can wait, thank you Wrestlinglover! starship.paint ~ KO 09:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Coordinator note: Unfortunately this has failed to gain consensus for promotion after being open for over three weeks—it will be archived shortly. You may renominate after the standard two-week waiting period. --Laser brain (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. --Laser brain (talk) 14:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.