Wikipedia:Featured article review/(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 17:43, 12 December 2007.

(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

previous FAR withdrawn

This article, as it stands, does not satisfy 1c, as there are very few references in this article, and that some of its references are broken or outdated. There was a previous FAR back in March when it was still on the Main Page. O₂ (息 • 吹) 01:45, 02 November 2007 (GMT)

I realize this page neds some work and it was brought to my attention the other day when the "Covers" section was erased due to lack of refs. Stan weller 03:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c). Marskell (talk) 08:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could meet GA status, but it falls short of the FA criteria at the moment. 11 citations. I would remove this FA at the moment, but with a bit of work it could reach GA again.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
GA, same here. Marlith ^T/C 05:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.