Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jim Henson

Jim Henson[edit]

Article is no longer a featured article.

Review commentary[edit]

I noticed the article is rather short (i.e. possibly not comprehensive) and desperately lacks any references, not to mention inline citations, footnotes, etc. Also, the Kermit sculpture image has no copyright information and the three fair use images use the old {{fairuse}} tags when they should use more specific ones, and do not provide rationale. In addition, I feel the ==Early work== part is too short to be a separate section. Todor →Bozhinov 20:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove No references? But then, it was one of the earlest FAs. But still, needs to be fixed. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 00:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Major reviews are not votes. It is a place to recognize FA criteria that the article does not currently meet. Joelito (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This one goes all the way back to '03. Not even close to FA standard. Marskell 12:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Main FA criteria concerns are citations (2c) and comprehensive (2b). Marskell 15:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per my nomination. Far from satistying the current FA criteria. Todor →Bozhinov 19:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can we quickly delist this one, obviously one of the worst of our FAs Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delist almost no lead, one-sentence paragraphs throughout, not referenced, many red links, visually unpleasing and difficult to read. Sandy 02:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]