Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Characters in the Halo series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Characters in the Halo series[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 16 days, 2 support, 2 oppose. No consensus to promote, no active discussions. Fail. Scorpion0422 21:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A fairly comprehensive article of the major characters in the Halo series. David Fuchs (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Shouldn't the title be something like List of characters in the Halo series? Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 03:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Technically yes. Its title implies it is an article, not a list, in the style of Characters of Final Fantasy VIII, Characters of Kingdom Hearts, or Characters in Castlevania: Sorrow series. The relevant list model would be List of Metal Gear Solid characters. It could go either way. With all the merchandise and reception the series has, I can see a nice reception section being made, although that would make it lean towards being more an article not a list. I would say it's up to the nominator, but I feel the article route can be pursued, similar to the aforementioned "Characters of/in..." articles. Naturally, that would terminate this nomination (as it wouldn't be a list really), but again, it's a route to be considered. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 05:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- We've argued this point a couple of times. It started out as 'list of'.. but we changed it, partly because that was an annoyingly long name. Frankly, I feel that it's better as a list because it has a much larger scope than one game, as are the above mentionsed articles. David Fuchs (talk) 18:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum: I also feel that a reception section would not work due to the scope as well. The reception of characters such as the Master Chief, Cortana and Arbiter are on their own pages; hopefully, the characters of the novels will be appraised when the novel's articles themselves get improved. David Fuchs (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe we hashed this exact same issue out earlier, with no real conclusion. This is more of a meta-question, and really somewhat irrelvant to whether the content is FL quality or not, so perhaps this is a discussion better suited outside of this list's FLC? Drewcifer (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's relevant because this nomination gets speedy failed if the article is not a list :p Anyhow, if you are going to stick with a list format, then a name change to List of characters in the Halo series would be better. Given that several "Character of/in..." articles are GA/FAs, and we have List of Metal Gear Solid characters as a FL, consistency is best. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, but it's kinda pointless to shoot down a FLC over semantics of naming. If it gets promoted, then we can change it, but are we really going to be procedural tightwads over this? David Fuchs (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't want to shoot this down, but I would like to mention that *now* is the time to decide about this. There's only one FL: List of Metal Gear Solid characters and only one FA: Characters of Final Fantasy VIII. Personally, I'd go with "List of characters..." -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:44, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, but it's kinda pointless to shoot down a FLC over semantics of naming. If it gets promoted, then we can change it, but are we really going to be procedural tightwads over this? David Fuchs (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's relevant because this nomination gets speedy failed if the article is not a list :p Anyhow, if you are going to stick with a list format, then a name change to List of characters in the Halo series would be better. Given that several "Character of/in..." articles are GA/FAs, and we have List of Metal Gear Solid characters as a FL, consistency is best. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe we hashed this exact same issue out earlier, with no real conclusion. This is more of a meta-question, and really somewhat irrelvant to whether the content is FL quality or not, so perhaps this is a discussion better suited outside of this list's FLC? Drewcifer (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe consider splitting "notes" and "references" so you don't need to repeat the full book reference every time? The notes would be something like "Trautman, Art of Halo, p. 34."; "Nylund, Fall of Reach, p. 67."; "Dietz, The Flood, p.234." and so on. Circeus (talk) 05:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Agree with Circeus, though, that the ref section is absolutely huge and could be shortened with Notes. Also agree that "List of characters..." would be a better title. Neither's a show-stopper, though. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think "characters" is better understood if we consider this as really many combined micro-articles rather than a "list" in the strictest meaning (where the members would have individual articles, cf. List of characters in Digimon Adventure#Other_humans, although that list needs severe plot trimming in other parts). Circeus (talk) 02:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - violates WP:FICT with excessive in-universe perspective and a lack of out-of-universe consideration. Halo is a massive cultural event - what cultural impact have these characters had? How have they played out in the real world? A featured list should be more than an account of imaginary events. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Going by List of Metal Gear Solid characters here and the FLC criteria: "useful, comprehensive, factually accurate, stable, uncontroversial and well-constructed." No where does it say a list must contain such info as you state above; "Comprehensive means that the list covers the defined scope by including every member of a set, or, in the case of dynamic lists, by not omitting any major component of the subject." Are all the important characters from the Halo series represented? Yes. David Fuchs (talk) 19:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Does FLC really intend to promote pages that violate our writing guidelines on topics? If so, there are rather substantial issues that need to be addressed with the entire process. However, I would suggest that WP:FICT is intended to speak to usefulness, comprehensiveness, and well-constructedness - that is, to declare what useful, comprehensive, and well-constructed coverage of fictional subjects will look like. In this case, the list excludes a massive component of the subject - real-world information.
- I mean, if FLC really wants to promote lists with no eye towards the content guidelines for the subjects, that's fine. I think, though, that if that is the case FLC would rapidly find that consensus does not exist for it to confer any sort of official status on pages in the form of page milestone markers. Phil Sandifer (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I kind of agree with you there. The page doesn't really meet the WP:FICT guidelines, but the notability of a list is not the responsibility of the FLC process. You should have proposed a merge or deletion prior to this. Perhaps the list should be withdrawn so this can be sorted out. -- Scorpion0422 01:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't support a merge or deletion - I think the list can be fixed. Which is what I proposed months ago when I evaluated the article for GA. Phil Sandifer (talk) 02:54, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I kind of agree with you there. The page doesn't really meet the WP:FICT guidelines, but the notability of a list is not the responsibility of the FLC process. You should have proposed a merge or deletion prior to this. Perhaps the list should be withdrawn so this can be sorted out. -- Scorpion0422 01:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - the difference here between this and List of Metal Gear Solid characters is the inclusion of out-of-universe information for the characters, whether development or reception tidbits, alongside the in-universe details. While naturally every character does not have to conform to this, as I doubt you can find such remote information on minor characters, I can see such information existing for the more major characters. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 19:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]