Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/FA-22 Raptor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FA-22 Raptor[edit]

Reason
Great angle, clear, and an excellent subect.
Articles this image appears in
F-22A Raptor, and Airplane, and many many more.
Creator
United States Air Force
Nominator
Why1991
  • Support — Why1991 20:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. This image has been nominated twice before (the previous nominations are at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/USAF F/A-22 and Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/F-22 Raptor). --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. And has faced nothing but opposition back then. The picture hasn't changed and the reasons from last October and November still hold. On a completely different matter: Your signature clutters the edit form considerably Why. --Dschwen 20:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose ¿Why1991's signature per Dschwen. ♠ SG →Talk 03:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, Is this going to be the GNAA of FPC? Thirding the sig objection. Why1991's sig is one of the key motivators behind my post to WP:VPR. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oh I didn't notice that post, and VP is definately the right place for that. I realized I might have started a little witchhunt here for Why1991, that was not my intention, I just wanted to calmly indidate that issue to him. --Dschwen 08:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose see my comments in previous nomination attempts. --Bridgecross 14:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose wasn't ready then and isn't now. Just technically not a great image. — Arjun 16:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have fixed how long my signature is. I'm sorry that I nominated this picture seeing that it has been nominated twice before. I had no clue. Can I take it off. I don't want to get in trouble for it being missing so what shall I do. Why1991 03:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Hmm that works? According to here it shouldn't. Maybe that page needs an update. As for the nomination, you can always retract it at your own discretion, just remove the template inclusion from here and leave this subpage intact so the third nomination stays on record. --Dschwen 14:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator. --KFP (talk | contribs) 16:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]