Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Three Days Grace/1
Three Days Grace[edit]
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Closing as delisted. Legitimate concerns, no improvements and no opposition. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 20:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe this article should be listed as a GA anymore. Promoted over five years ago, I believe this article's prose and organization has decayed over time and the standards for GA were lower back then. Plus, looking at the GA review, it was glazed over and passed pretty quick. There are way too many {{citation needed}}s for a good article, and some bare sentences that are neither tagged or referenced. These issues haven't been addressed in quite a while, so I would like to nominate this for a community reassessment. Thanks, Jacedc (talk) 03:29, 18 April 2015 (UTC)