Wikipedia:Peer review/2007 Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form/archive1

2007 Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the page needs to be individually audited for quality for this featured topic candidacy. Thanks, Will ^(talk) 21:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• What exactly do you need for this? Is there a description somewhere of how to do this evaluation you could provide a link to? Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

  I need an individual audit for quality for this article, as it's part of a featured topic candidacy, and it's too short for GA. Will ^(talk) 10:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Anything that can be expanded upon, any errors, things that should be cited, and WP:MOS changes. Zginder ^{(talk) (Contrib)} 15:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

One WP:Lead error is that the article title does not appear in bold in the first sentence. I agree that this might seem a bit unnatural in this case, and you may be able to argue that an exception could be made. Another detail that could be mentioned explicitly is that the 2007 awards are for shows premiering in 2006. Also, though it is included in the summary table, I think is worth giving the name of the winning episode in the main text as well.

After all of that though, I have to ask if this topic really needs an article? I don't think it hurts to have one so won't go so far as to AfD it, but would point out that there's no yearly articles for even the Academy Award for Best Picture, no doubt the most prestigious entertainment award. While the winner and nominees are no doubt notable, isn't it enough to have them mentioned in the main Hugo short form article, the 2007 awards article, and the article for each nominated episode? If, on the other hand, something makes the 2007 short form award particularly notable, that's fine, but it should be mentioned prominently in the article.--jwanders^Talk 18:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Arctic Gnome wrote this on the featured topic candidates page: "This collection of episodes is a bit random, the only thing they have in common with each other is the fact that they were all nominated for the same award. I do think that there is potential in a featured topic structured like this, but the lead article would have to spend more time talking about the episodes themselves, describing what the 2007 nominees have in common with each other and how this batch of nominees is notable from other years' nominees." Zginder ^{(talk) (Contrib)} 20:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)