Wikipedia:Peer review/Boy Scout/archive1

Boy Scout[edit]

A current Good Article, would like to improve it to at least A-class and perhaps even FA status. Thanks for helping.Rlevse 14:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done. I made a few minor changes, you might want to look through the page's history to see my edit summaries so you know why I did what I did :) Keep up the excellent work! --JohnDBuell 01:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Automated suggestions are provided here, that you may wish to refer for some useful style guidelines. - Mailer Diablo 17:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks and did them.Rlevse 17:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. The "Organization" section seems a bit out of place though, although if it were reworked to show how each level related to the individual Scout's experience, then its inclusion would make sense. Jim62sch 19:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a sentence or two on this. Let me know if you have specific ideas on organization to make it even better. Thanks for the help.Rlevse 20:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not as international as I would have expected. For example, I understand that the Canadian scout organization has declined in recent years into near oblivion. The United Way controversy is also notable, but missing. Deet 18:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't about organizations, but the boy himself (the first clause is "A Boy Scout is a boy") See Scouting for international/organization/movement focus.Rlevse 19:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]