Wikipedia:Peer review/Like I Love You/archive1
Like I Love You[edit]
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have expanded the article with more references. I would like comments on improvement to get the article to Good Article standard.
Thanks, 03md 15:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Interesting article, but I think it needs more work and expansion before it is ready for GA. Here are some suggestions for improvement.
- The lead should be an accessible and inviting overview of the whole article. Nothing important should be in the lead only - since it is a summary, it should all be repeated in the body of the article itself but there is a fair amount in the lead that is not repeated in the article. Please see WP:LEAD
- The Background and writing section makes no mention of actually writing the song. There are 5 authors listed in the infobox - what role did they all play?
- There is nothing on the recording of the song either - also nothing on making the video (presumably where Kevin Federline dances)
- Remixes/official versions has no refs - my rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref.
- The article seems to use too much of its material direct quotations - this should be paraphrased (keep the info) and the best phrases / sentences kept as quotes. See WP:NFCC
- Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Songs#Article_content for official WIkiProject Songs suggestions
- I think a model article is also helpful for ideas to follow and examples - there are manys FAs on songs, see Category:FA-Class song articles and even more GAs, see Category:GA-Class song articles
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)