Wikipedia:Peer review/Thomas Henry Flewett/archive1

Thomas Henry Flewett[edit]

I've listed this article for peer review because it is my first lengthy contribution. Also having worked with the man for over ten years, I am concerned about objectivity. I would like reviewers to read it and let me know what they think. Thanks, GrahamColm 18:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Flewett's contribution to virology was great." Instead of telling us it was great, tell us what was great and why. Avoid vague sentences. Jeff Dahl 05:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yes of course, I'll work on this this.

GrahamColm 17:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 03:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]