Wikipedia:WikiProject Fire Protection/Ratings
The following is a rating system for use by the WikiProject Fire Protection.
There are five possible ratings, and these are color-coded. Individuals should not take these assessments personally. It is understood that we all have different priorities and different opinions about what makes a perfect article.
Ratings
[edit]| Article-Alert grading scheme | |
|---|---|
| Stub | These articles are stubs; they are short or insufficient pieces of information, but they are long enough to at least define the article's title. |
| Poor | Theses articles are a start, but they need a lot of work. They may be missing large amounts of information, be totally skewed towards a POV, or they may be written in very bad English. |
| Needs exp/org/NPOV/etc. | These articles aren't bad, but need expansion, organization, and/or a neutral point of view. Alternatively, the English may need a comprehensive rewrite for better "flow". |
| Good | These articles meet the criteria described on Wikipedia:What is a good article. They should be well written, factually accurate, have broad and neutral point of view, and referenced. Where possible, they should contain images which are appropriately tagged and have succinct captions. However, lack of images does not prevent an article being good. With a little care, these could be Featured Article candidates. |
| Featured | These articles have received "Featured article" status and meet the current criteria for featured articles; they should be well written, comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral, and stable. |
| Needs rating | These articles have not yet been rating using the above scale. Please help by rating this article. |