Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia has more...

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This page has been mentioned by a media organization:

Peter Thonemann (26 May 2016). "The all-conquering Wikipedia?". Times Literary Supplement (TLS). Archived from the original on 26 May 2016. Retrieved 26 May 2016.

Cool essay[edit]

This is an interesting essay, Rich, thanks. Obviously both praise and criticism sometimes go over board. (I've put an update into the blog post you mention.) There's another one here, if you're interested in verifying and tracking it:

Wikipedia has far more “Featured Articles” (articles that have won Wikipedia’s highest quality award) on video gaming than it has on chemistry and mineralogy, computing, language and linguistics, mathematics, philosophy and psychology combined.

Best, --Andreas JN 466 20:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That one might be worth a few minutes. "Coverage on Wikipedia is very good for episodes of Lost, but it doesn't have great coverage of female artists" is another, though just from a comment. "Coverage" is maybe too vague a term to do much with though. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:40, 22 May 2015 (UTC).