Talk:Shulchan Aruch HaRav

Untitled

Rabbi Boruch Leshes says that the current draff version we have is missing a lot of wholes volume, his basis for this claim is the footnotes written by the Alter Rebbe, which point to volumes that we don't have. He has shown in his Shabbos Halacha Shiurim footnotes pointing upto volume 16. He brings from a few sources from the Alter Rebbe's children - mainly the Mitler Rebbe - that the draff version we have today, where copies of the Alter Rebbe's draft by other Chosidim so they could have more to learn from. A simillar statement is found in the Publisher's forward of the english edition which is being printed by Kehot in recent years. 220.233.48.200 10:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

There is no question that much is missing, but I don't know how large the volumes are that he speaks about. There are whole sections obviously missing in the middle of the volumes we have now, such as Hilchot Channukah. Possibly, those could have been considered volumes by themselves. I was quite annoyed when I found out that a section (on Birkat Hamazon) I thought was lost in the fire turned out to be a misprint in my edition... Can you imagine if I hadn't checked in another set? PhatJew 20:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Chabad Related Article?

• This article is not of relevance merely to Chabad Hassidim, and should not be considered a Chabad article, but a Judasim article. It is a universally cited authority on Jewish Law, and should be in the same category as the Mishna Brura or Kitzur Shulchan Aruch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.168.14.20 (talk) 00:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
  • I totally disagree. The Tzemach Tzedek is also regularly quoted by modern day poskim; does that mean he should be taken out of the Chabad section?! Yehoishophot Oliver (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Shulchan Aruch HaRav

The printed title is just "Shulchan Aruch", and many Chabad adherents refer to it by that name. So why does this name appear at all in the article as a separate title?

Shulchan Aruch HaRav

The printed title is just "Shulchan Aruch", and many Chabad adherents refer to it by that name. So why does this name appear at all in the article as a separate title? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levikleh (talk • contribs) 18:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shulchan Aruch HaRav. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714230107/http://shulchanaruchharav.com/Halacha/default.aspx to http://shulchanaruchharav.com/Halacha/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)