Talk:F. Scott Fitzgerald

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateF. Scott Fitzgerald is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleF. Scott Fitzgerald has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2020Good article nomineeListed
June 28, 2020Good article reassessmentKept
November 28, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
December 20, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 11, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that F. Scott Fitzgerald's works, such as The Great Gatsby, only gained popularity after his death?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 24, 2021.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Peer Review nomination[edit]

Hi @HAL333: Would you be interested in co-nominating this article with me for WP:Peer Review? I'm hoping to take it through a lengthy Peer Review process on the long, winding road to a possible FAC submission. — Flask (talk) 01:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flask I would be happy to - glad to see that someone else has taken interest in this article. ~ HAL333 23:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HAL333: Great! I'll likely submit it later this weekend or early next week, and I shall list you as co-nominator. — Flask (talk) 06:17, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@HAL333: Article has been submitted for Peer Review: Wikipedia: Peer review/F. Scott Fitzgerald/archive1Flask (talk) 17:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Flask and HAL333: now that the article has a balanced and comprehensive section on the works themselves (the absence of which, as I understand it, causes the previous FAC's archival), do you two have any plans to renominate it? I would highly encourage it... Aza24 (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Aza24: I still plan to revise the article in the coming months before renomination. I'm in the middle of a very intensive program in RL, but I should have more time to do the necessary revisions in the coming weeks. One of the criticisms mentioned in the previous nomination was a lack of thematic cohesion which I plan to address with several rewrites. — Flask (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's so great to hear Flask. I hope my comment doesn't come off as rushing you, I was just curious so figured I'd check in. Aza24 (talk) 19:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]