Template:Did you know nominations/Marcelle Auclair

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Marcelle Auclair

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that fashion magazine Marie Claire's co-founder Marcelle Auclair also wrote biographies of socialist Jean Jaures and Catholic Saints Teresa of Avila and Bernadette of Lourdes?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Marquis Flowers

Created by Presearch (talk). Self nom at 02:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• Length, date verified. Hook's offline refs accepted AGF by seasoned editor. All non-lead paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent paraphrasing issues. Interesting hook; hook length ok. Only issue is the pending QPQ review. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

• QPQ is now done (see above). Also, to further enhance the hook, here are two ALT hooks that have images (hook otherwise unchanged: only images need review, and both are from WP commons, and both are now in article):

• ALT1: ... that fashion magazine Marie Claire's co-founder Marcelle Auclair also wrote biographies of socialist Jean Jaures and Catholic Saints Teresa of Avila and Bernadette of Lourdes (pictured)?

• ALT2: ... that fashion magazine Marie Claire's co-founder Marcelle Auclair also wrote biographies of socialist Jean Jaures and Catholic Saints Teresa of Avila (pictured) and Bernadette of Lourdes?

Verifying the images should be quick, so perhaps you can now check off all 3 hook versions as good to go. Do you have any preferences about which version is best? I think I prefer ALT2. You? Thanks -- Presearch (talk) 19:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

With the QPQ done, this one is good to go. I prefer the image-less, original hook. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the review/approval and thanks for the opinion. I guess now whoever promotes the hook will get the deciding "vote"... which I suppose they would anyway... I'll be happy with whatever version is run. Thanks again -- Presearch (talk) 01:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)