User talk:Brian Fenton
Test --Brian Fenton 11:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi see your last article for how to categorize. This is very useful James Janderson 11:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks James! That's useful to know. --Brian Fenton 11:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Madrid and Vueling[edit]
Hi! I checked the airline website, and the route doesn't start until March 29. In that case, oag.com correctly displays that the route indeed exists from March 29 onward. I included that in the Madrid airport article. If the route hasn't started yet, then it would be nice if the editor adds a note saying so. Cheers. /ɪlεktʃɹɪk bluː/ 17:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Peter Perrett[edit]
Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability ("Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.") and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion from Wikipedia articles,[2] talk pages, user pages, and project space." As you can see it's not to me (or any other editor to look for sources) but it's your responsibility to add them as you add the material. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:44, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- Possibly a bit but there is too much adding of young children of notable people. In this case they are adults but I didn't know that. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
CFD for Category:Emotion[edit]
Hi, I've just made an alternative proposal regarding the renaming of Category:Emotion, and I thought you might like to comment before the discussion closes. Thanks. Cgingold 15:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello Brian Fenton! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Peter Cochrane (futurologist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Juan José Millás - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Peter Cochrane (futurologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Long term unreferenced BLP.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 05:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Irish Times survey[edit]
Hi Brian,
Could you add a reference to the Irish Times survey you noted in the Ireland article. I cannot find it online.
If there is a link, all the better!
--RA (talk) 08:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter[edit]
| |||
Self-references[edit]
Hi there. I've altered your recent edit to Toxoplasmosis because Wikipedia articles should avoid referring to themselves or to other articles directly in the text. Thank you for providing the prodding I needed to add a reference and summary to that part of the article! Danger High voltage! 18:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Jeffrey A. Winters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability not established
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of TinyCog[edit]
The article TinyCog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable software, no independent references provided.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Finngall talk 22:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TinyCog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TinyCog until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Finngall talk 18:43, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
References[edit]
We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Brian Fenton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Khaplam wai for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khaplam wai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaplam wai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Brian Fenton. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi[edit]
If you find time for it could you take a look at my recent noms at TAFI Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominations. Would appreciate no matter what !vote as no one is attending the TAFI nom page anymore to give input. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Brian Fenton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Regarding the B class update requested on Ken Kesey[edit]
Hi Brian,
I would gladly give you the B-Class update for the Ken Kesey bio. However when comparing to Star and Good article, there are not citations in the intro and these citation need to be moved in their respective sections of the article.
Also in career section what years do you cover per section would help. Use this star bio as an example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bernard_Shaw
Will gladly upgrade your article to B-class and remove it from the list once done.Filmman3000 (talk) 20:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The article SPEED II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No independent sources, no assertion of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 14:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Claudio Domenicali[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Claudio Domenicali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BangJan1999 16:21, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Warning on personal attacks[edit]
You need to stop the personal attacks in response to having your articles deleted. For example, you created the article Claudio Domenicali with the article consisting of three words: "CEO of Ducati." That article does not meet Wikipedia's standards and when I speedy deleted it upon request of another editor you engaged in personal attacks on my talk page. I also saw that you similarly attacked User:Eddie891 after they deleted a different article of yours. Please read up on the Wikipedia policy against personal attacks and refrain from doing this in the future. Sincerely, --SouthernNights (talk) 23:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. It's a bit of an exaggeration that these are personal attacks, but I get it - the Deletionists rule here. Don't worry, I'm not going to bother contributing here any more. It's too exhausting dealing with the red tape. Brian Fenton (talk) 23:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)