Jump to content

Pietro Colonna Galatino: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: Line 6:
He received the habit as early as 1480, studied Oriental languages in [[Rome]] and was appointed lector at the convent of [[Ara Coeli]]; he also held the office of provincial in the province of [[Bari]], and that of [[penitentiary]] under [[Leo X]].
He received the habit as early as 1480, studied Oriental languages in [[Rome]] and was appointed lector at the convent of [[Ara Coeli]]; he also held the office of provincial in the province of [[Bari]], and that of [[penitentiary]] under [[Leo X]].


Galatino wrote his chief work ''De Arcanis Catholicae Veritatis'', at the request of the pope, the emperor, and other dignitaries, in [[1516]], at which time, owing mainly to [[John Reuchlin]]'s ''Augenspiegel'', the famous controversy on the authority of the Jewish writings was assuming a very high profile. Galatino took up Reuchlin's defence. Resolved to combat the Jews on their own ground, he turned the [[Cabbala]] against them, and sought to convince them that their own books yielded proof of the truth of the Christian religion, hence their opposition to it should be branded as obstinacy. He gave his work the form of a dialogue. The two conflicting Christian parties were represented by Capnio (Reuchlin) and the Inquisitor [[Jacob van Hoogstraaten]], O.P. In conciliatory terms, Galatino responded to the queries and suggestions of the former, and refuted the objections of the latter. He had borrowed largely from the ''[[Pugio Fidei]]'' of the Dominican [[Raymond Martini]], remodelling, however, the material and supplementing it with copious quotations from the ''[[Zohar]]'' and the ''[[Sodei Razayya]]'' of [[Eleazer of Worms]].
Galatino wrote his chief work ''De Arcanis Catholicae Veritatis'', at the request of the pope, the emperor, and other dignitaries, in [[1516]], at which time, owing mainly to [[John Reuchlin]]'s ''Augenspiegel'', the famous controversy on the authority of the Jewish writings was assuming a very high profile. Galatino took up Reuchlin's defence. Resolved to combat the Jews on their own ground, he turned the [[Cabbala]] against them, and sought to convince them that their own books yielded proof of the truth of the Christian religion, hence their opposition to it should be branded as obstinacy. He gave his work the form of a dialogue. The two conflicting Christian parties were represented by Capnio (Reuchlin) and the Inquisitor [[Jacob van Hoogstraaten]], O.P. In conciliatory terms, Galatino responded to the queries and suggestions of the former, and refuted the objections of the latter. He had borrowed largely from the ''[[Pugio Fidei]]'' of the Dominican [[Raymond Martini]], remodelling, however, the material and supplementing it with copious quotations from the ''[[Zohar]]'' and the ''[[Iggeret ha-sodot]]'' of the Jewish convert [[Pablo de Heredia]].


In a long letter to [[Paul III]] (MS. Vat. Libr., cod. Ottob. Lat. 2366, fol. 300-308) he vehemently defended himself and his party against the charge of having forged the last-named book, which he firmly held to be the work of [[Rabbenu ha-Kadosh]]. Galatino was aware, no less than his critics, that his ''De Arcanis'' had many shortcomings, both in matter and form, and he begged his readers to consider that he was compelled to finish it within the space of a year and a half. The work became very popular and ran through several editions.
In a long letter to [[Paul III]] (MS. Vat. Libr., cod. Ottob. Lat. 2366, fol. 300-308) he vehemently defended himself and his party against the charge of having forged the last-named book, which he firmly held to be the work of [[Rabbenu ha-Kadosh]]. Galatino was aware, no less than his critics, that his ''De Arcanis'' had many shortcomings, both in matter and form, and he begged his readers to consider that he was compelled to finish it within the space of a year and a half. The work became very popular and ran through several editions.

Revision as of 05:14, 30 May 2008

Pietro Colonna Galatino, also known as Petrus Galatinus (died after 1539) was an Italian Friar Minor, philosopher, theologian, and Orientalist.

Biography

Galatino was born at Galatina (Lecce) in Puglia.

He received the habit as early as 1480, studied Oriental languages in Rome and was appointed lector at the convent of Ara Coeli; he also held the office of provincial in the province of Bari, and that of penitentiary under Leo X.

Galatino wrote his chief work De Arcanis Catholicae Veritatis, at the request of the pope, the emperor, and other dignitaries, in 1516, at which time, owing mainly to John Reuchlin's Augenspiegel, the famous controversy on the authority of the Jewish writings was assuming a very high profile. Galatino took up Reuchlin's defence. Resolved to combat the Jews on their own ground, he turned the Cabbala against them, and sought to convince them that their own books yielded proof of the truth of the Christian religion, hence their opposition to it should be branded as obstinacy. He gave his work the form of a dialogue. The two conflicting Christian parties were represented by Capnio (Reuchlin) and the Inquisitor Jacob van Hoogstraaten, O.P. In conciliatory terms, Galatino responded to the queries and suggestions of the former, and refuted the objections of the latter. He had borrowed largely from the Pugio Fidei of the Dominican Raymond Martini, remodelling, however, the material and supplementing it with copious quotations from the Zohar and the Iggeret ha-sodot of the Jewish convert Pablo de Heredia.

In a long letter to Paul III (MS. Vat. Libr., cod. Ottob. Lat. 2366, fol. 300-308) he vehemently defended himself and his party against the charge of having forged the last-named book, which he firmly held to be the work of Rabbenu ha-Kadosh. Galatino was aware, no less than his critics, that his De Arcanis had many shortcomings, both in matter and form, and he begged his readers to consider that he was compelled to finish it within the space of a year and a half. The work became very popular and ran through several editions.

For the rest, Galatino's extensive knowledge and his thorough acquaintance with Greek, Hebrew, and Jewish Aramaic is fully borne out by his numerous other unpublished writings. In bold language he inveighs against the corruption among the clergy and discusses the question of reform. While engaged on his remarkable work De Vera Theologia his strength threatened to fail him by reason of his great age and infirmity, but, having taken a vow to defend in the course of this work the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin, he instantly, so he tells us, recovered his strength and health (MSS. 52, 54, 60, St. Isidore's Coll.).

In 1539, Paul III, in a special Bull, bequeathed Galatino's works, about thirty in number, to the convent of Ara Coeli and enjoined that special care be taken of them. The manuscripts are now preserved in various Roman archives.

Galatino in Rome.

References

  • Arduinus Kleinhans, De vita et operibus P. Galatini OFM, Antonianum, 1 (1926), 145-179, 327-356
  • Saverio Campanini, Le prefazioni, le dediche e i colophon di Gershom Soncino, in Giuliano Tamani (ed.), L’attività editoriale di Gershom Soncino. 1502-1527, Soncino 1997, pp. 31-58.
  • Sharon Leftley, Beyond Joachim of Fiore: Pietro Galatino's Commentaria in Apocalypsim, Franciscan Studies 55 (1998), 137-167
  • Petrus Galatinus (Pietro Colonna Galatino/Monggius/Mongio/Colombo, c. 1460/1465, Galatina (Apulia) - 1540, Rome) - FRANCISCAN AUTHORS, 13TH - 18TH CENTURY: A CATALOGUE IN PROGRESS
  • Public Domain Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Pietro Colonna Galatino". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

 This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)